I'd like to use the "MetaMegaProtoUser " for users who want a quick look at ESME without having to go through all the hassles of setting up an internal OpenID provider. For productive usage, the MetaMegaProtoUser obviously isn't suitable -- but, to be truthful, we are still far from having something that is suitable for production. I'm just trying to lower the bridge to taking ESME for a "test drive". D.
________________________________ From: David Pollak [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wed 08.04.2009 02:12 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: MetaMegaProtoUser Usage in ESME +1 Proto user was designed for prototyping and not meant for production. On Apr 6, 2009 9:34 AM, "Erik Engbrecht" <[email protected]> wrote: I think MetaMegaProtoUser is a little too mega for my tastes... I'm going to make an attempt at diving into the code this afternoon and see what I can come up with. But I'd like to see the user be a little less mega and a little more pluggable. So my inkling is to remove the dependency on MetaMegaProtoUser, not increase it. We'll see where that goes... On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Hirsch, Richard <[email protected]>wrote: > Any chance that someone can make this change? The MetaMegaPro... -- http://erikengbrecht.blogspot.com/
