I'd like to get Hudson in place now. As the number of committers increases (which I sure will happen :->), a CI environment will be critical to maintain code quality and to improve our development-related processes.
D. On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree. Starting continuous integration for ESME is a great idea and > would greatly facilitate testing. Of course, having automated tests > makes it much more useful and our current test coverage is pretty bad, > which is a problem I'm contributing to... > > Ethan > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:34 AM, David Pollak > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I've been exploring the Hudson site for Apache >>> (http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/) and am pretty impressed. >>> >>> I've seen that lift also uses Hudson ( >>> http://hudson.scala-tools.org/job/Lift/) >>> >>> I'm considering adding ESME to the Apache Hudson. >>> >>> Anyone have any problems with this? >>> >> >> Great idea. >> >> >>> >>> Is there any committer who has Hudson experience to assist me setting >>> up the project on Hudson >>> >> >> I have very limited exposure to Hudson, but setting up a project is pretty >> much pointing at the source repository and say "build when this thing >> changes." >> >> >>> >>> D. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net >> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp >> Surf the harmonics >> >
