Just stopping by quickly to say +1.
As regarding the OS choices I have never worked much with Solaris
myself, more of a Linux person - but quite preferenceless in this case.
/Anne
On 3. nov. 2009, at 14.55, Richard Hirsch wrote:
Do we have a preference for the build environment?
OS choice(s): one or both of Solaris 10 or Ubuntu 8.10
D.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Richard Hirsch
<[email protected]> wrote:
I'd like to get Hudson in place now. As the number of committers
increases (which I sure will happen :->), a CI environment will be
critical to maintain code quality and to improve our
development-related processes.
D.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]>
wrote:
I agree. Starting continuous integration for ESME is a great idea
and
would greatly facilitate testing. Of course, having automated tests
makes it much more useful and our current test coverage is pretty
bad,
which is a problem I'm contributing to...
Ethan
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:34 AM, David Pollak
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]
>wrote:
I've been exploring the Hudson site for Apache
(http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/) and am pretty impressed.
I've seen that lift also uses Hudson (
http://hudson.scala-tools.org/job/Lift/)
I'm considering adding ESME to the Apache Hudson.
Anyone have any problems with this?
Great idea.
Is there any committer who has Hudson experience to assist me
setting
up the project on Hudson
I have very limited exposure to Hudson, but setting up a project
is pretty
much pointing at the source repository and say "build when this
thing
changes."
D.
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Surf the harmonics
