Do we have a preference for the build environment?
OS choice(s): one or both of Solaris 10 or Ubuntu 8.10
D.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd like to get Hudson in place now. As the number of committers
> increases (which I sure will happen :->), a CI environment will be
> critical to maintain code quality and to improve our
> development-related processes.
>
> D.
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I agree. Starting continuous integration for ESME is a great idea and
>> would greatly facilitate testing. Of course, having automated tests
>> makes it much more useful and our current test coverage is pretty bad,
>> which is a problem I'm contributing to...
>>
>> Ethan
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:34 AM, David Pollak
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've been exploring the Hudson site for Apache
>>>> (http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/) and am pretty impressed.
>>>>
>>>> I've seen that lift also uses Hudson (
>>>> http://hudson.scala-tools.org/job/Lift/)
>>>>
>>>> I'm considering adding ESME to the Apache Hudson.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone have any problems with this?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Great idea.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is there any committer who has Hudson experience to assist me setting
>>>> up the project on Hudson
>>>>
>>>
>>> I have very limited exposure to Hudson, but setting up a project is pretty
>>> much pointing at the source repository and say "build when this thing
>>> changes."
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
>>> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
>>> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
>>> Surf the harmonics
>>>
>>
>
