+1 for the proposal. Much cleaner than the process we ended up with last time.
Anne On 6 Sep 2010 19:45, "Richard Hirsch" <[email protected]> wrote: > LOL - I know we produce quality code but to give the release a "+1" > before testing would be a bit premature :-> > > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 (for the proposal - I will test the release before giving it +1 ;-) >> >> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I've just created a tagged version in SVN. The tag is called >>> "apache-esme-1.1-RC1-incubating". This version is a release candidate >>> - that is the reason that it has a 'RC' in its name. Please test this >>> tagged release and try and find bugs. If you find bugs, please create >>> a JIRA issue for that bug >>> >>> I'll deploy this version to Stax tomorrow. >>> >>> On September 9, if there are no errors in this RC, I will create a >>> new tagged version "apache-esme-1.1-incubating", create a signed tar, >>> etc and then start a vote on esme-dev. If there are errors found in >>> the RC1 version, after correcting the errors, I will create a new RC >>> and we will test again. >>> >>> Any one have any problems with this proposal? I'm trying to just have >>> one vote per release on esme-dev rather than multiple ones. >>> >>> D. >>> >>
