One more question..
Which browser is it?

On 8 September 2010 11:00, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you.
> I probably won't have time to look at any of this before the weekend. Out
> traveling again this week...
>
>
>
> On 8 September 2010 10:58, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> look here - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-278
>>
>> I've added a screenshot
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I don't see any bullets...
>> > Could you create a Jira task and attach a screenshot?
>> >
>> >
>> > On 7 September 2010 20:49, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Search doesn't work either but I probably made a mistake somewhere in
>> >> the compass configuration was sort of rushed  - there is also a small
>> >> bug on the followers page for users - bullets are visible when they
>> >> shouldn't be
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > Found a couple of UI bugs, created Jira items for them. Both involve
>> the
>> >> > footer not displaying correctly on pages, so nothing major.
>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-276
>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-277
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 7 September 2010 20:05, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]
>> >
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Testing it now ;-)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 7 September 2010 16:44, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> tagged version now deployed on stax
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> >> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>> > +1 for the proposal.  Much cleaner than the process we ended up
>> with
>> >> >>> last
>> >> >>> > time.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Anne
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > On 6 Sep 2010 19:45, "Richard Hirsch" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> LOL - I know we produce quality code but to give the release a
>> "+1"
>> >> >>> >> before testing would be a bit premature :->
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Ethan Jewett <
>> [email protected]>
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> +1 (for the proposal - I will test the release before giving it
>> +1
>> >> ;-)
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Richard Hirsch <
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > wrote:
>> >> >>> >>>> I've just created a tagged version in SVN. The tag is called
>> >> >>> >>>> "apache-esme-1.1-RC1-incubating". This version is a release
>> >> candidate
>> >> >>> >>>> - that is the reason that it has a 'RC' in its name. Please
>> test
>> >> this
>> >> >>> >>>> tagged release and try and find bugs. If you find bugs, please
>> >> create
>> >> >>> >>>> a JIRA issue for that bug
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>> I'll deploy this version to Stax tomorrow.
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>> On September 9, if there are no errors in this RC,  I will
>> create
>> >> a
>> >> >>> >>>> new tagged version "apache-esme-1.1-incubating", create a
>> signed
>> >> tar,
>> >> >>> >>>> etc and then start a vote on esme-dev.  If there are errors
>> found
>> >> in
>> >> >>> >>>> the RC1 version, after correcting the errors,  I will create a
>> new
>> >> RC
>> >> >>> >>>> and we will test again.
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>> Any one have any problems with this proposal? I'm trying to
>> just
>> >> have
>> >> >>> >>>> one vote per release on esme-dev rather than multiple ones.
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>> D.
>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to