Found a couple of UI bugs, created Jira items for them. Both involve the
footer not displaying correctly on pages, so nothing major.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-276
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-277


On 7 September 2010 20:05, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote:

> Testing it now ;-)
>
>
>
> On 7 September 2010 16:44, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> tagged version now deployed on stax
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > +1 for the proposal.  Much cleaner than the process we ended up with
>> last
>> > time.
>> >
>> > Anne
>> >
>> > On 6 Sep 2010 19:45, "Richard Hirsch" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> LOL - I know we produce quality code but to give the release a "+1"
>> >> before testing would be a bit premature :->
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>> +1 (for the proposal - I will test the release before giving it +1 ;-)
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>>> I've just created a tagged version in SVN. The tag is called
>> >>>> "apache-esme-1.1-RC1-incubating". This version is a release candidate
>> >>>> - that is the reason that it has a 'RC' in its name. Please test this
>> >>>> tagged release and try and find bugs. If you find bugs, please create
>> >>>> a JIRA issue for that bug
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'll deploy this version to Stax tomorrow.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On September 9, if there are no errors in this RC,  I will create a
>> >>>> new tagged version "apache-esme-1.1-incubating", create a signed tar,
>> >>>> etc and then start a vote on esme-dev.  If there are errors found in
>> >>>> the RC1 version, after correcting the errors,  I will create a new RC
>> >>>> and we will test again.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Any one have any problems with this proposal? I'm trying to just have
>> >>>> one vote per release on esme-dev rather than multiple ones.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> D.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to