I made the changes to the code as quoted below, but I still don't get a
valid data offset (0xFFFFFFFE).


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Andreas Stewering-Bone [mailto:[email protected]] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. November 2010 22:14
An: [email protected]
Cc: Michael Sagner
Betreff: Re: [etherlab-users] EL2502 problem

Hello Michael,


please note the exclude directive in the xml description,

you must not use pdo 0x1600 and 0x1602 at the same time, eg 0x1601 and
0x1603


Am Wednesday 10 November 2010 19:27:04 schrieb Michael Sagner:
>         ec_pdo_info_t el2502_pdos[] = {
>         {0x1600, 1, el2502_pdo_entries + 0}, /* PWM RxPDO-Map  Ch.1 */
>         {0x1602, 1, el2502_pdo_entries + 1}, /* Freq RxPDO-Map  Ch.1 */
>         {0x1601, 1, el2502_pdo_entries + 2}, /* PWM RxPDO-Map  Ch.2 */
>         {0x1603, 1, el2502_pdo_entries + 3}, /* Freq RxPDO-Map  Ch.2 */
>         };

it should be

         ec_pdo_info_t el2502_pdos[] = {
         {0x1602, 2, el2502_pdo_entries }, /* Freq RxPDO-Map  Ch.1 */
         {0x1603, 2, el2502_pdo_entries + 2}, /* Freq RxPDO-Map  Ch.2 */
         };

Greatings 

Andreas

_______________________________________________
etherlab-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users

Reply via email to