Hi Daniel,
It was done in a RTAI kernel-thread.
I had modified the example supplied by IgH Ethercat Master.
I had plugged a digital scope to see the jitter, while checking missing packets
in dmesg. The goal was just to see how fast EtherCAT was.
best regards
---
Sebastien BLANCHET
On 03/08/2018 03:54 PM, PAUL-SOFTWARE wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
did you implement your code as a kernel-thread or as a rtai-userspace-process
getting these results?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
i.A. Daniel Koch
Elektronik/Software
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Maschinenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG
Max-Paul-Str. 1 | 88525 Duermentingen | Deutschland/Germany
Phone: +49 (7371) 500 - 0 | Fax: +49 (7371) 500 - 111
Mail: softw...@paul.eu | Web: www.paul.eu
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kommanditgesellschaft, Sitz Duermentingen, Registergericht Ulm HRA 650073,
Pers. haftende Gesellschafterin:
Paul Maschinenfabrik GmbH, Sitz Riedlingen, Registergericht Ulm HRB 650013, GF:
Werner Paul, USt-IdNr. DE146544409
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: etherlab-users [mailto:etherlab-users-boun...@etherlab.org] Im Auftrag von
Sebastien Blanchet
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2018 14:37
An: etherlab-users@etherlab.org
Betreff: Re: [etherlab-users] yet another datagrams UNMATCHED - DC 0.2ms / 5kHz
// igb kernel 3.18
Hi Jürgen,
I can share with you some results with the 8139too and r8169 ethercat native
drivers when used with RTAI and Preempt-RT kernel.
- with RTAI and 8139too you can achieve 10 KHz for the ethercat control loop
without losing datagram. (tested on Debian 6.0 i386 with RTAI-3.8.1). The
computer was a DELL Precision 390 with a Core Duo 2 processor, the slave were 4
Beckhoff Ethercat terminals (EL1004, EL2004, EL3102, EL4102).
- with Preempt-RT and r8169 you can achieve 1 KHz for the ethercat control loop
without losing datagram. (tested on Debian 7.0 i386 with Debian RT kernel).
At 2 KHz, it does not work very well (sometime you miss datagrams), so the
limit is somewhere in the 1...2 KHz range. The computer is a Beckhoff
C6920-0040 with the PCIe extension slots, and a Celeron B810 processor. The
slaves are 4 Kollmorgen AKD servo drives + 13 other Ethercat terminals from
Beckhoff.
Finally Preempt-RT is slower than RTAI, but it is really easier than RTAI.
best regards,
--
Sebastien BLANCHET
On 02/13/2018 02:12 PM, Christoph Schroeder wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
On 02/13/2018 10:01 AM, Jürgen Walter • DATATRONiQ wrote:
I see- will get another Intel card (although compatible ones (kernel driver
e1000, e1000e) seem to be hard to come by these days) and try with anther
kernel driver.
I also did some tests with the EtherCAT master, Xenomai and different network
devices compatible with the ec_e1000e driver.
Test system was a Core-i5 (4th generation) with a Debian Wheezy (Kernel 3.2)
with two slaves attached (Microship LAN9252 in simple Digital I/O mode). I
observed the following:
* even with the PREEMPT patch and the native driver ec_e1000e I could barely
achieve 2000Hz cycle rate without frame losses
* with Xenomai I could go over 10000Hz without a problem, but there are some
other issues with Xenomai:
o the EtherCAT master is not ready to use the newer Xenomai 3.x branch
and
the Xenomai 2.x branch is not supported anymore
o I got some issues with long term stability on my test system (Kernel
panic) and decided not to use it on a productive system
o I would suggest you go for RTAI since you will also get far more help
from the EtherCAT community, I could barely find other people here who
also use Xenomai with the EtherCAT master
* while using Xenomai I observed, that there is also a huge difference
between
different network chips:
o I initially used a card with an Intel 82572EI (introduced Q4'05) and
also tried a Dual port card with an Intel 82571EB (introduced Q3'05)
which had basically the same results on my test system
o the best results I got were achieved with an Intel 82574L (introduced
Q2'0)
I didn't try RTAI till now, but I think you will get the same or even better
results than I got with Xenomai.
The cards with Intel 82574L we got were sold as "Intel Gigabit CT Desktop
Adapter". The chip will be produced until 2020, so getting a card with it should
be no problem. Maybe this will help you.
Best regards,
Christoph
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH
Mitglied der Hermann von Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher Forschungszentren e.V.
Aufsichtsrat: Vorsitzender Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher, stv. Vorsitzende Dr. Jutta
Koch-Unterseher
Geschäftsführung: Prof. Dr. Bernd Rech (kommissarisch), Thomas Frederking
Sitz Berlin, AG Charlottenburg, 89 HRB 5583
Postadresse:
Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1
D-14109 Berlin
http://www.helmholtz-berlin.de
_______________________________________________
etherlab-users mailing list
etherlab-users@etherlab.org
http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
