On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:14:44 +0200, M. Uli Kusterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just wondering: What about Garma? Sounds Swedish, no accents...
garma was taken. ummm er... Actually, current garma components has a strong promise for copyright assignment to FSF. There should be no new garma component. I am just trying to use the word to draw the political line between old and new components. But if you really want to get the name, I can rename garma to something else and let you use it. (I just want to group thing for the promise, no intention for anything about cooperative) > I know, I said I didn't care about the name, but > that was mainly because I wanted to get it over > with quickly. Maybe just "Etoile" without the > accents? Though both look to me like pretty much > just one already-existing word, which might > hamper google-ability. Using a name that we can have .org is a strong point for future advertisement plan in my opinion thus I don't think it is a must.
