Le 25 avr. 05, à 21:15, Yen-Ju Chen a écrit :
On 4/24/05, David Chisnall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 23 Apr 2005, at 13:34, Nicolas Roard wrote:
an user could then use theses components to do what he will do with
garageband. But the UI will truely, absolutely, sucks.
Perhaps we could provide a lightweight scripting language, with a UI
like Automator (or, at least, how I assume Automator works - I haven't
actually used it) for combining components, perhaps built on StepTalk?
I guess it would be possible; not easy to do correctly, but possible :-)
But imho we could start with normal apps heavily using frameworks and
bundles,
and progressively move toward that, once we figure good solutions ?
[snip]
As for the choice of scripting language,
I would like to suggest Ruby (www.ruby-lang.org).
GNUstep does have a Ruby interface (RIGS),
though it is not under active development.
Depends; one good thing would be to add Ruby and Python bundles to
StepTalk
(that shouldn't be very complex). The interest is that once you
"expose" your objects
in StepTalk, they will be accessible for all the langages supported in
StepTalk.
It would be great to have classes in the Smalltalk bundle of StepTalk,
too..
--
Nicolas Roard
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
-Arthur C. Clarke
