Hi!

On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 01:36:27PM +0800, Sheldon Gill wrote:
> Well, CIE would be good...
> 
> commercially I'd say PANTONE...
> 
> In the end, though, you are working in RGB so defining an RGB color space 
> should suffice.

I'm just curious. What advantages do we have from that? Do the icons look better
then when you print them out on a professional printer?


> The image you give (from Adobe ImageReady) has gamma but no ICC profile. I 
> assume its supposed to be sRGB but there is nothing to say that. There's 
> nothing to say your monitor is calibrated accordingly either so its pure 
> conjecture as to whether the gamma is valid.
> 
> On a separate issue, I think you should carefully choose the exact colours 
> so that they display well using at least 5-bit color or a 256 color indexed 
> palatte. These better suit smaller devices.

I'm not an expert on that topic, but I haven't seen a device with just
256 colors in a very long time. I wonder if it really makes sense to
optimize for this.

These colour-related issues are really interesting. :-) I'm always
surprised how seemingly simple topics can be really complex when
transferred to a professional level. :-) Just take your time to make a
good colour decision. It's better to do that now than to change all the
icons later. :-)

-Guenther


_______________________________________________
Etoile-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss

Répondre à