On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Matt Schalit wrote: > Yes, that's a first year economics point of view that's valid. People > could argue that Nike shoes are better than others. People could also > argue that buying Nike shoes supports the poor treatment of children > in other countries. People could argue that Mitsubishi VCRs are the > best in their price range, but buying those would mean supporting a > company that destroys more rain forest in South America than any > other. Products made in America are required to conform to certain > social taxes and constraints. We attempt to harm ourselves and our > environment less than other countries do.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Try again. Kodak is NY State's number one polluter for something like 12 years in a row. -Chad _______________________________________________ etree.org etree mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mail.etree.org/mailman/listinfo/etree Need help? Ask <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
