On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Rob Hudson wrote:

> 
> Who cares which distro it is as long as it's GNU and Linux underneath.
> 
I second that opinion.

Generally, I like:

SuSE for my own use.  It is big and fat with lots and lots of tools.
                      It also has nice usable configuration tools.

Debian for certain clients.  It is big, but philosophically pure.
                      Thus, I perfer it for LinuxFund.org, PLUG,
                      ltplus.org, and other OpenSource organizations.

RedHat for most clients.  It has sort of become the accepted professional
                      standard for Linux in the USA.
                      (SuSE plays this role in Europe and TurboLinux plays
                      this role in East Asia.)

Corel or Caldera for certain end-users
                      Corel is cool.  It is polished and easy to use.
                      However, it is a desktop distribution without the
                      security needed for servers.  It also lacks the
                      tools hackers want (compilers, emacs, etc.)

Finally, I commonly mix and match things between distributions.
                      I often create my configuration files with SuSE
                      (or sometimes Corel) and copy them to my RedHat
                      systems.  Sometimes I will go the other way.
                      I also move software from one distribution to
                      another.  It all works together - at least most
                      of the time.

                                          Sincerely,
                                          David Mandel
                                          Chief Activist
                                          Portland Linux/Unix Group
                                          1440 NE 59th
                                          Portland, Oregon 97213

  P.S.  Linux works fine on 486 computers.  I used a couple Linux 
        486/33 computers for heavy production work for years.
        One had 16 mb RAM and the other had 96 mb.
        As I recall, I ran SLS (Soft Landing Software), Slackware,
        and SuSE on these machines.  I may have used RedHat as well.
        Along these lines, I have ran Linux including X-Windows on
        machines as small as 386/16s with 6 mb of RAM.  X-Windows
        is very slow on a 386/16 with 6 mb of RAM, but it works
        and works well.  My client found the demonstration very
        impressive.
  ======================================================================
  David Mandel - Linux Evangelist                Avalon Technology Group
  VP - Training & Software Development               0607 SW Idaho St.
  (503) 246-3630 Voice                            Portland, Oregon 97201
  (503) 246-3124 Fax                          http://www.avalongroup.net
       Linux&Dual Boot Systems * Linux Networking * Linux Training
  ======================================================================

Reply via email to