I vote that we all are "president" of the LUG! There is not "job description" so if we do need one president, then we should clarify the duties of the position.
Jamie On Tuesday 27 November 2001 03:14, you wrote: > OK, so it's Tuesday morning, and no signs yet of a consensus on > where the organisational meeting will be. > I can't say why noticing that [EMAIL PROTECTED] subscriptions > approach a hundred makes me sure we need a bit of organisation, but there > we are. The second officer we need to appoint is a secretary, to post the > minutes to the list. (So far, President Seth has no opposition, even if > his election is under auspices suspicious - nobody else wanted the job > when Seth volunteered). > Because I plan to attend, I'll note that I have room for a > passenger if driving is required to get to the meeting.
