Whats the job description? maybe Ill apply... I seem to have the time for 
it.. I do like the idea of all of us being presidents though... its sooo 
anarchisiticly irrisistable (sorry about the spelling.... )

Jamie

On Tuesday 27 November 2001 11:16, you wrote:
> I'll second it.  I would be GLAD to retire and become Past President.
> (grin)
>
> KBob is my first choice in fact....
>
> As for:
> > but this business of "Seth is the
> > best guy for all jobs" is bunk.
>
> I have pretty much being saying that myself for a while... and said so to
> Jim Darrough
> last night in fact...
>
> re: "Nobody wanted the job" is bull-crap.
> I have a few times attempted to get some people to step up and 'take over'.
> So far,
> to not much avail.  History on request....
>
> Seth
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: kg7fu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:34 AM
> Subject: [EUG-LUG:244] ORDER! [WAS EUG-LUG:239] Re: EUGLUG organizational
> meeting NEXT Thursday (11/29)
>
> > Bit 'o history....
> >
> > When Darrough and Kaplan resurrected the Eugene Linux
> > Users Group, Kaplan became de facto president and El Jeffe.
> >
> > Cohn, in a bloodless coup, stole the tri-corner newspaper
> > cap and imaginary gavel (Only Kaplan posseses the REAL
> > gavel deal). In fact, it was an e-mail SNAFU by which I found
> > out I was not supposed to be talking to the public and corporate
> > sectors about Linux anymore. "Nobody wanted the job" is bull-crap.
> >
> > We, sans Cohn and probably everyone at EFN, had grand plans
> > for ELUG and none of them were even slightly close to BSD,
> > pumping GPL or stuff like that the original basis and purpose was
> > to spread the word, amass a knowledge base and help thy fellow
> > PC enthusiast. Seems a bit more sinister and weird now, eh?
> >
> > About 2 years ago (check the archives) we had arguments pertaining
> > to organizing ELUG. I defer to those arguments pro and con and
> > hereby present a motion to defer organizational discussion until such
> > time that a reliable, knowledgable, personable and stable(?) individual
> > or panel can be installed as El Jeffe, etc and organizational skills, etc
> > be honed and displayed for our general perusal.
> >
> > Now, for something completely different....
> >
> > I nominate new-guy-in-town-sorta KBob, El Jeffe, with Bob Crandell,
> > Veep and Larry, Ben or Ed, Secretary. Seth should share Technical
> > Issues and Intelligence with, say Rob and maybe a younger member,
> > as a panel. We should have a Corporate Interface position, preferably
> > with non-retail, non-gasoline sales experience (Crandell?) and an
> > Information Officer to propagate pamphlets, impress the press and amuse
> > the news. Jaime and at least one other should cover the newsgroups &
> > mail lists.
> >
> > Further, I motion we carry these positions until such time as
>
> difficulties,
>
> > personal or professional issues or traitorus acts present themselves or
> > one year whichever comes first, for each office. At that time we will
>
> appoint
>
> > a panel of 4-6 to nominate officers.
> >
> > I'm not promoting "Robert's Rules", but this business of "Seth is the
> > best guy for all jobs" is bunk.
>
>  I'm sure he is busy enough with outside
>
> > projects as well to carry this motley crew through growing pains while
> > retaining his famous "objectivity". No offense to Mr. Cohn, he's a great
> > person, but if we're going to do this, let's do it democratically as
> > possible, eh?
> >
> > Have we any seconds to the motion?
> >
> > James Kaplan
> >
> > On Tuesday 27 November 2001 03:14, Sum Yung Guy wrote:
> > > (So far, President Seth has no opposition, even if
> > > his election is under auspices suspicious - nobody else wanted the job
> > > when Seth volunteered).
> > > Because I plan to attend, I'll note that I have room for a
> > > passenger if driving is required to get to the meeting.
> >
> > _________________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Reply via email to