And to ammend the following statements.... Personally I'd recommend DemoLinux 3 over Suse Live any day. Much quicker to get going and a whole lot easier on the end user. Suse Live is almost like doing a whole install (and takes quite some time) for which you set many variables. I'd recommend that to someone who would like to experience installing linux without installing it! If they wanted to USE it rather than configure it Demo is the only way to go.
That's my $0.01 (penny pinching season) Mr O On Thursday 28 March 2002 11:21 am, you wrote: > On Thursday 28 March 2002 10:24, Linux Rocks ! wrote: > > The first situation is really the only diskless, but the second > > option (cdrom) is generally considered a diskless workstion (remember > > Seth's I-Opener.... Thats how that works...) > > So... If your system does infact boot cdrom's, then try out the suse > > 6.4 live demo (anybody got a copy we could send tim?). Ive used it > > DemoLinux (http://demolinux.org, see also: > http://newsforge.com/newsforge/02/03/26/0312228.shtml?tid=23) might be > good for this too. They use the same techniques as RedHat and SuSE, > but (as of DemoLinux 2.0) they are based on Debian (version 1 was based > on an early Mandrake version). Never touch the hard drive was (is?) > their mantra.
