On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 11:34:35AM -0800, Cory Petkovsek wrote: > MRO, I don't think you read what I wrote, either. > > I had an X environment with fonts that were adequate. My XF86Config-4 > looked like this: > > Section "Files" > RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" > ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" > EndSection
Looks like 'X -configure' default settings. > I installed Abiword and it told me load a specific module: > Section "Module" > ... > Load "type1" > EndSection > > I also moved the 100dpi line above the 75dpi line. This caused all of > my fonts that normally would be rendered at 75dpi to use some ugly and > larger 100dpi fonts. I tried removing all of the fontpath lines and it > did restore my settings, however I discovered X has a default font path > with 75dpi before 100dpi. I've now reconfigured both my xfs(x font > server) and the XF86Config file to support all of these fonts with 75dpi > first. Next I setup an xfstt font server with some truetype fonts. Now > I can view among other things, websites that are windows-centric > specifying windows fonts. So, why does Debian diverge from the the default configuration? -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Eug-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
