On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:48:47AM -0700, Jacob Meuser wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 07:20:46PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: >> >> I understand why you might want a shorter or less verbose license than the >> GNU GPL > >> It is ILLEGAL, under Copyright law, to >> misrepresent the authorship of a work, in whole or in part. > >> A license explains the terms, pure and simple. > >> What may I do with this pile of code? What may I not? > >Do you see problems with the following? > ># Copyright (c) 2003 Jacob Meuser. All rights reserved. ># Redistribution and use with or without modification ># are permitted. This software is provided "as is". >
Yes; it does not clarify if you're asserting copyright over Joseph's quoted text. -- "That time in Seattle... was a nightmare. I came out of it dead broke, without a house, without anything except a girlfriend and a knowledge of UNIX." "Well, that's something," Avi says. "Normally those two are mutually exclusive." --Neal Stephenson, "Cryptonomicon" _______________________________________________ EuG-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
