fuck it, i'm just going to use the BSD license.  either that, or i face a long
re-write of this damned thing (and i'd rather be coding...)

thank you all for your feedback, i've learned an important lesson here.

--- Cory Petkovsek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 12:20:17PM -0700, justin bengtson wrote:
> > tell that to RMS and the FSF crowd.  i'm not going to get into this debate
> > because it's pointless.  my beliefs and yours are different.  need i remind
> you
> > how many religions exist, much less how many different _licenses_ exist?
> > 
> > besides, i recall saying something about "if the software was truely free,
> it
> > would be in the public domain"...
> My point was that you should not put your philosophy (like, I believe..
> I don't believe...) in the license.  The license will be an example of
> your philosophy, but your philosophy itself does not belong in the
> document.  Whether or not I tell the RMS/FSF crowd doesn't matter for
> your license.
> 
>  
> > > Note that you are forcing the user to have alternative licensed data.
> > > Perhaps they consider the graphics for their program as IP and want
> > > only to receive credit for it, but would otherwise want it
> > > redistributable.
> > 
> > i am considering contracting graphics/data work to other friends of mine,
> and
> > they may have different ideas about IP than i do.  hence, the statement. 
> So is this just a license for yourself, or are you making a license that
> others might use?  If it is just for yourself, why have so much
> legalese?
> 
> > > They may
> > > also use it regardless of a loophole, just to see if the copyright
> > > holder has enough financial resources to sue.
> > 
> > in that case, what's the point of the GPL?
> As to others using the breaking the license to see if someone will sue,
> that can be done with any license.  The abuser hopes that the holder
> doesn't have enough resources.  In the case of the linux, there are
> enough users and vendors to make a big stink and do something about it
> (hopefully).  In the case of some "cory's program" released under the
> gpl.  Well, who knows?
> 
> Cory
> 
> -- 
> Cory Petkovsek                                       Adapting Information
> Adaptable IT Consulting                                Technology to your   
> (541) 914-8417                                                   business
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                  www.AdaptableIT.com
> _______________________________________________
> EuG-LUG mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug


=====
Justin Bengtson  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

E-mail, or any form of writing, is not true communication,
and can only result in the misinterpretation of meanings.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
EuG-LUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug

Reply via email to