Actually it's been upgraded. 3.06Ghz stock. CPU and RAM are still working on a 1:1 ratio since my RAM can attain considerably higher frequencies than my CPU can.
--- Larry Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Saturday, November 29, 2003, at 08:25 PM, Mr O wrote: > > > Anyone else overclock at all? What kind of problems? My > machine > > is super stable at 3495Mhz but pushing it over that causes > > programs to just die whenever they want. :> Let me get this straight, :> you're talking a stock 2.4Ghz CPU :> and you are complaining because it won't work properly at :> 3.4Ghz...? > > I would think sync problems would be the least of your > worries; > at that speed you may be running in to issues with the speed > at which > data is being loaded > in to the processor cache, which would cause all sorts of > weird errors > (like attempts to execute segments that haven't been loaded > yet) > At > > 3588Mhz the temp is still under 90 degrees Farenheit. :> This means it's USELESS as a Toaster. > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree _______________________________________________ EuG-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
