On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:57:31PM -0800, Chris LeBlanc wrote:
> >IMO Richard Stallman is dangerous.
> >
> I would say just the opposite. The ones that I think are dangerous is
> folks like ESR, who don't mind watering down the freedoms they expect,
> just to get a "win" by wooing some big company.
I don't have the time to properly respond to this now, but I will just say
in brief that Eric is equally dangerous IMO in a completely different
direction.
Richard will alienate people to get what he wants even if it is not
absolutely necessary. Eric will placate anyone to get them to support
open source and gain him more notoriety. Both are bad things.
Rest I can respond to later.
--
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act,
but a habit."
-- Aristotle
_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
