The only packets going in go to 10.0.0.3 and 10.0.0.4. No packet should
show a destination address of 10.0.0.100. 10.0.0.100 is the IP of the
other end of the ppp tunnels. It will always be the same for all
tunnels. I will try deleting only 1 of the 2 routes and see if that
helps, but I'f afraid that would weight things unfairly toward one
tunnel.
-Mike
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 17:58 -0800, Bob Miller wrote:
> Mike Cherba wrote:
>
> > The 2 routes to the same host make sense. I'm actually opening 2
> > tunnels to the same VPN box. Using destination based routing I wanted
> > to make the traffic flow down different tunnels. Anyway, our guy in
> > Taiwan managed to get it working following my instructions and is going
> > to send me his test report.
>
> When the kernel has a packet destined to 10.0.0.100, it has to decide
> which interface to send the packet on. The routing table is
> ambiguous. Either route goes to 10.0.0.100, but one goes through ppp0
> and the other goes through ppp1. Which shall it use?
The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree,
is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals.
We cause accidents. --- Nathaniel Borenstein
_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
