This sounds closest to what you are looking for so far. Each route can
only have one gateway, or if there are two it has to choose - one or the
other. So here you are specifiying the route.
I was thinking client to site earlier ( split tunneling ) but this looks
more like a site to site setup.. are you looking to add redundancy ?
If this works I'd be interested to know how well it went. .. and if
packets are flowing and one tunnel goes down how did it handle that ?
Thanks,
Mark
Bob Miller wrote:
Mike Cherba wrote:
The only packets going in go to 10.0.0.3 and 10.0.0.4. No packet should
show a destination address of 10.0.0.100. 10.0.0.100 is the IP of the
other end of the ppp tunnels. It will always be the same for all
tunnels. I will try deleting only 1 of the 2 routes and see if that
helps, but I'f afraid that would weight things unfairly toward one
tunnel.
Oh. I thought 10.0.0.{3,4} were the other ends of the tunnels.
Your routes to 10.0.0.{3,4} should specify a gateway, then.
ip route add 10.0.0.3 via 10.0.0.100 dev ppp0
ip route add 10.0.0.4 via 10.0.0.100 dev ppp1
_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
