On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 03:50:35PM -0800, Brian Gallagher wrote:
> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:50:35 -0800
> From: Brian Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Wireless router follow-up
> 
> I've done some backyard mechanics, I know what you mean...get out the 
> Chilton's!

heh... I wish it was backyard... its more like backwoods! (im about 15 
miles from the nearest parts store!) I'f I mess something up, im so 
screwed!

Jamie

> 
> Windoz and braking...priceless!
> 
> Good Luck,
> 
> Brian
> 
> LinuxRocks! wrote:
> >You'd be surprised how easy it is... There are step by step tutorials 
> >(that make it much easier) google or linked from wikipedia, and google, 
> >and too many forums to list. 
> >I have to change the brake pads (front only) today, and it looks like it 
> >wont break 40 degrees outside... now that will be difficult... infact, 
> >might not happen till tommorow! 
> >
> >Jamie
> >
> >On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 12:06:24PM -0800, Brian Gallagher wrote:
> >  
> >>Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 12:06:24 -0800
> >>From: Brian Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group <[email protected]>
> >>Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Wireless router follow-up
> >>
> >>Its Greek to me, but I'm cataloging our dialog as a starting point for, 
> >>what looks like, a long Winter!
> >>
> >>Brian
> >>
> >>LinuxRocks! wrote:
> >>    
> >>>Dude... wanna get WET?
> >>>Wireless Ethernet Bridge (WET): Similar to client mode, it allows wired 
> >>>computers to connect wirelessly. This mode however allows computers to 
> >>>be on the same subnet as the access point.
> >>>
> >>>Jamie
> >>>
> >>>On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:20:33AM -0800, Brian Gallagher wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>      
> >>>>Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 11:20:33 -0800
> >>>>From: Brian Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group <[email protected]>
> >>>>Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Wireless router follow-up
> >>>>
> >>>>Jamie
> >>>>
> >>>>Thanks for getting back, thought I burned everyone's ears off 
> >>>>yesterday.  Funny you should mention the car, now I will be looking to 
> >>>>see if birds are flying by.  I talked to my house mate and we are going 
> >>>>to start with the antenna, Garl suggested.  I will pass along the 
> >>>>update info.  We may end up at the bridge that, Ben talked about.
> >>>>
> >>>>Computing can be an expensive hobby!
> >>>>
> >>>>Brian
> >>>>
> >>>>LinuxRocks! wrote:
> >>>>   
> >>>>        
> >>>>>On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 08:06:14AM -0800, Brian Gallagher wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>>Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 08:06:14 -0800
> >>>>>>From: Brian Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>>To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>Subject: [Eug-lug] Wireless router follow-up
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>I don't think the wired solution, as Bob suggested, is going to 
> >>>>>>happen (just my gut feeling.)  A wired solution is what I had in mind 
> >>>>>>from the beginning (over a year ago.)  I say this because (A) I 
> >>>>>>didn't want people to think I'm not using my head here and (B) 
> >>>>>>liability issues make that solution non-viable.  As it turns out the 
> >>>>>>wired/wireless solutions are about the same cost when I start to 
> >>>>>>factor in all the little parts I would need on top of the cable, with 
> >>>>>>a finger on the scale for liability issues.  I acknowledge that a 
> >>>>>>wired solution would be very simple and secure, but it looks like I 
> >>>>>>have to go out on the limb, not down to the ground.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>As I have said before, here is what I know about wireless...not much! 
> >>>>>>So I am looking for some advice about wireless in general.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Background: this wireless setup worked for most of the year, or so, 
> >>>>>>of use.  In my gyrations of attempting to learn about wireless I have 
> >>>>>>been testing various cards, OS's, computers, and locations, so I 
> >>>>>>hadn't noticed why my connectivity was faltering.
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>       
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>Funny thing about wireless networking, theres lots of stuff that can 
> >>>>>interfere with it that you simply cannot see. It can be working fine, 
> >>>>>then your neighbor buys a new car, parks it in the garage (instead of 
> >>>>>the street) and poof, network disapears! you can have a great signal, 
> >>>>>then take 2 steps, and have none. You can have a perfect signal one 
> >>>>>day, the next its all crazy.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>>Present: at my preferred location (P) I get a signal strength of no 
> >>>>>>more then 25% and at the garage location (G) I get a signal of 75%.  
> >>>>>>I have noted that I get dropped from G and my house mate says the he 
> >>>>>>has been experiencing drop recently.  The router looks very similar 
> >>>>>>to the WRT54GL, probably an earlier version.  I note that I can get 
> >>>>>>on late / early with no problem, with business hours being the 
> >>>>>>problem.
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>       
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>can you check the router out, on the bottom of it, it will says what 
> >>>>>it is (wrt54g/wrt54gs/wrt54gl, and version number) also check the 
> >>>>>first 4 letters of its serial number, and check that wikipedia link to 
> >>>>>confirm what version it is... If you can upgrade the router to dd-wrt, 
> >>>>>or even hyperwrt, then you can turn up the xmitter, and that might be 
> >>>>>just enough to do what you need w/out buying anything new.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>>Question: is it reasonable that under normal conditions of three 
> >>>>>>users, heavy usage, and good signal I should not be getting dropped?  
> >>>>>>That is, can a router of this type handle three simultaneous sessions 
> >>>>>>indefinitely?  It has been suggested that the router is getting 
> >>>>>>"tired" after being on for years.  I am going to offer to replace the 
> >>>>>>router with the WRT54GL (65.74 @ mwave.com) and I don't want to find 
> >>>>>>that the problem is something down the Comcast stream that I can't do 
> >>>>>>anything about.  Oh, and did I mention that Xbox live is in the mix?
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>       
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>That doesnt sound resonable to me... You should be albe to handle 
> >>>>>dozens of users w/out issue.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Jamie
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>>Sorry for the long winded email, but my objective is to turn another 
> >>>>>>corner in my OSS quest.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Brian
> >>>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>>EUGLUG mailing list
> >>>>>>[email protected]
> >>>>>>http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>       
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>EUGLUG mailing list
> >>>>>[email protected]
> >>>>>http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>          
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>EUGLUG mailing list
> >>>>[email protected]
> >>>>http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
> >>>>   
> >>>>        
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>EUGLUG mailing list
> >>>[email protected]
> >>>http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>      
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>EUGLUG mailing list
> >>[email protected]
> >>http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
> >>    
> >_______________________________________________
> >EUGLUG mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
> >
> >
> >  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EUGLUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

Reply via email to