On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:07:57AM -0800, Brian Gallagher wrote:
> Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 01:07:57 -0800
> From: Brian Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Wireless router follow-up
> 
> Well, if its rolling.  You could always run it over here Friday.  I've 
> got the  floor  jack, stands, and tools.  I don't have a car, but my 
> brother-in-law is an excellent mechanic and I'm sure I could pester him 
> for a ride to the store if need be.  Its on you.

Well.. its rolling! I was thinking of going into town to get supplies, I 
may not have time to do the brakes. Its mostly the being cold that makes 
it sooo easy to put working on the brakes off... I figure If i get a 
bunch of groceries, then i can spend the whole weekend if i want fixing 
the brakes...

It looks like the router i hooked up today isnt playing very nice, so 
thats another excuse not to work on the brakes tommorow. Wow, i wonder 
how long i can put it off!

Jamie

> 
> LinuxRocks! wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 03:50:35PM -0800, Brian Gallagher wrote:
> >  
> >>Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:50:35 -0800
> >>From: Brian Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group <[email protected]>
> >>Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Wireless router follow-up
> >>
> >>I've done some backyard mechanics, I know what you mean...get out the 
> >>Chilton's!
> >>    
> >
> >heh... I wish it was backyard... its more like backwoods! (im about 15 
> >miles from the nearest parts store!) I'f I mess something up, im so 
> >screwed!
> >
> >Jamie
> >
> >  
> >>Windoz and braking...priceless!
> >>
> >>Good Luck,
> >>
> >>Brian
> >>
> >>LinuxRocks! wrote:
> >>    
> >>>You'd be surprised how easy it is... There are step by step tutorials 
> >>>(that make it much easier) google or linked from wikipedia, and google, 
> >>>and too many forums to list. 
> >>>I have to change the brake pads (front only) today, and it looks like it 
> >>>wont break 40 degrees outside... now that will be difficult... infact, 
> >>>might not happen till tommorow! 
> >>>
> >>>Jamie
> >>>
> >>>On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 12:06:24PM -0800, Brian Gallagher wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>      
> >>>>Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 12:06:24 -0800
> >>>>From: Brian Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group <[email protected]>
> >>>>Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Wireless router follow-up
> >>>>
> >>>>Its Greek to me, but I'm cataloging our dialog as a starting point for, 
> >>>>what looks like, a long Winter!
> >>>>
> >>>>Brian
> >>>>
> >>>>LinuxRocks! wrote:
> >>>>   
> >>>>        
> >>>>>Dude... wanna get WET?
> >>>>>Wireless Ethernet Bridge (WET): Similar to client mode, it allows 
> >>>>>wired computers to connect wirelessly. This mode however allows 
> >>>>>computers to be on the same subnet as the access point.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Jamie
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:20:33AM -0800, Brian Gallagher wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>>Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 11:20:33 -0800
> >>>>>>From: Brian Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>>To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Wireless router follow-up
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Jamie
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Thanks for getting back, thought I burned everyone's ears off 
> >>>>>>yesterday.  Funny you should mention the car, now I will be looking 
> >>>>>>to see if birds are flying by.  I talked to my house mate and we are 
> >>>>>>going to start with the antenna, Garl suggested.  I will pass along 
> >>>>>>the update info.  We may end up at the bridge that, Ben talked about.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Computing can be an expensive hobby!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Brian
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>LinuxRocks! wrote:
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>       
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>>>On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 08:06:14AM -0800, Brian Gallagher wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    
> >>>>>>>         
> >>>>>>>              
> >>>>>>>>Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 08:06:14 -0800
> >>>>>>>>From: Brian Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>>>>To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>Subject: [Eug-lug] Wireless router follow-up
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>I don't think the wired solution, as Bob suggested, is going to 
> >>>>>>>>happen (just my gut feeling.)  A wired solution is what I had in 
> >>>>>>>>mind 
> >>>>>>>>from the beginning (over a year ago.)  I say this because (A) I 
> >>>>>>>              
> >>>>>>>>didn't want people to think I'm not using my head here and (B) 
> >>>>>>>>liability issues make that solution non-viable.  As it turns out 
> >>>>>>>>the wired/wireless solutions are about the same cost when I start 
> >>>>>>>>to factor in all the little parts I would need on top of the cable, 
> >>>>>>>>with a finger on the scale for liability issues.  I acknowledge 
> >>>>>>>>that a wired solution would be very simple and secure, but it looks 
> >>>>>>>>like I have to go out on the limb, not down to the ground.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>As I have said before, here is what I know about wireless...not 
> >>>>>>>>much! So I am looking for some advice about wireless in general.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Background: this wireless setup worked for most of the year, or so, 
> >>>>>>>>of use.  In my gyrations of attempting to learn about wireless I 
> >>>>>>>>have been testing various cards, OS's, computers, and locations, so 
> >>>>>>>>I hadn't noticed why my connectivity was faltering.
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>      
> >>>>>>>>           
> >>>>>>>>                
> >>>>>>>Funny thing about wireless networking, theres lots of stuff that can 
> >>>>>>>interfere with it that you simply cannot see. It can be working 
> >>>>>>>fine, then your neighbor buys a new car, parks it in the garage 
> >>>>>>>(instead of the street) and poof, network disapears! you can have a 
> >>>>>>>great signal, then take 2 steps, and have none. You can have a 
> >>>>>>>perfect signal one day, the next its all crazy.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    
> >>>>>>>         
> >>>>>>>              
> >>>>>>>>Present: at my preferred location (P) I get a signal strength of no 
> >>>>>>>>more then 25% and at the garage location (G) I get a signal of 75%. 
> >>>>>>>>I have noted that I get dropped from G and my house mate says the 
> >>>>>>>>he has been experiencing drop recently.  The router looks very 
> >>>>>>>>similar to the WRT54GL, probably an earlier version.  I note that I 
> >>>>>>>>can get on late / early with no problem, with business hours being 
> >>>>>>>>the problem.
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>      
> >>>>>>>>           
> >>>>>>>>                
> >>>>>>>can you check the router out, on the bottom of it, it will says what 
> >>>>>>>it is (wrt54g/wrt54gs/wrt54gl, and version number) also check the 
> >>>>>>>first 4 letters of its serial number, and check that wikipedia link 
> >>>>>>>to confirm what version it is... If you can upgrade the router to 
> >>>>>>>dd-wrt, or even hyperwrt, then you can turn up the xmitter, and that 
> >>>>>>>might be just enough to do what you need w/out buying anything new.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    
> >>>>>>>         
> >>>>>>>              
> >>>>>>>>Question: is it reasonable that under normal conditions of three 
> >>>>>>>>users, heavy usage, and good signal I should not be getting 
> >>>>>>>>dropped?  That is, can a router of this type handle three 
> >>>>>>>>simultaneous sessions indefinitely?  It has been suggested that the 
> >>>>>>>>router is getting "tired" after being on for years.  I am going to 
> >>>>>>>>offer to replace the router with the WRT54GL (65.74 @ mwave.com) 
> >>>>>>>>and I don't want to find that the problem is something down the 
> >>>>>>>>Comcast stream that I can't do anything about.  Oh, and did I 
> >>>>>>>>mention that Xbox live is in the mix?
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>      
> >>>>>>>>           
> >>>>>>>>                
> >>>>>>>That doesnt sound resonable to me... You should be albe to handle 
> >>>>>>>dozens of users w/out issue.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Jamie
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    
> >>>>>>>         
> >>>>>>>              
> >>>>>>>>Sorry for the long winded email, but my objective is to turn 
> >>>>>>>>another corner in my OSS quest.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Brian
> >>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>EUGLUG mailing list
> >>>>>>>>[email protected]
> >>>>>>>>http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>      
> >>>>>>>>           
> >>>>>>>>                
> >>>>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>EUGLUG mailing list
> >>>>>>>[email protected]
> >>>>>>>http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    
> >>>>>>>         
> >>>>>>>              
> >>>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>>EUGLUG mailing list
> >>>>>>[email protected]
> >>>>>>http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>       
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>EUGLUG mailing list
> >>>>>[email protected]
> >>>>>http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>          
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>EUGLUG mailing list
> >>>>[email protected]
> >>>>http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
> >>>>   
> >>>>        
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>EUGLUG mailing list
> >>>[email protected]
> >>>http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>      
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>EUGLUG mailing list
> >>[email protected]
> >>http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
> >>    
> >_______________________________________________
> >EUGLUG mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
> >
> >
> >  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EUGLUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

Reply via email to