EV Digest 5979

Topics covered in this issue include:

  1) Re: Getting an AC motor inverter built
        by Lee Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  2) Re: Lithium-ion batteries & Valence Group buy
        by "Roland Wiench" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  3) Re: Truck tailgate up vs down, Was=> Re: Ranger doner
        by "Roland Wiench" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  4) DCP's DCDC --> Vicor.  Takers?
        by Bob Bath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  5) Re: Lithium-ion batteries & Valence Group buy
        by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  6) RE: Lithium-ion batteries & Valence Group buy
        by "Michael Trefry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  7) RE: Getting an AC motor inverter built
        by "Roger Stockton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  8) RE: Lithium-ion batteries & Valence Group buy
        by "Michael Trefry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  9) Re: Lithium-ion batteries & Valence Group buy
        by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 10) RE: Build EV For Someone Else
        by "David Roden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 11) Slashdot: Electric Vehicle Kits for the Masses?
        by Nick Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 12) Re: Comparator circuit 1.0 for nicad pack monitoring
        by "Mike Phillips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 13) RE: Lithium-ion batteries & Valence Group buy
        by "Don Cameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 14) Re: Lithium-ion batteries & Valence Group buy
        by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 15) Re: Lithium-ion batteries & Valence Group buy
        by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 16) Short Range Medium Performance Conversion of an 85 MR2
        by "Kip C Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 17) Re: Lithium-ion batteries & Valence Group buy
        by Ian Page-Echols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 18) Re: Short Range Medium Performance Conversion of an 85 MR2
        by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 19) Saft NiCd supplier
        by "John G. Lussmyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 20) Re: Short Range Medium Performance Conversion of an 85 MR2
        by Steven Ciciora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Begin Message ---
Eric Poulsen wrote:
You don't really explain your desire for a new AC controller design.

I think it's fairly obvious. He wants a source for Ac motor controllers that doesn't cost an arm and a leg. But it's a challenging project! Most of the people who have "toughed through" it realize that they spend a lot of time and money on it. They understandably don't want to just give it all away for nothing.

Plus, building a full-blown AC motor controller is more like building a house than a birdhouse. It takes a lot of skill, special tools, time, and money. The average Joe that wants plans for free off the internet will never follow through and build it (but will nevertheless bug the author to death for free advice! :-)

The closest thing to what you want are the plans in the Motor Control Handbook by Richard Valentine. Buy the book, get the plans, build the controller.

Jack Murray wrote:
How about one that will drive any AC motor?

This is possible; just harder. You have to write extra software to allow the user to "tune" the drive, and depend on the user having all the necessary measurement capabilities and knowledge to know what he wants it to do without breaking something.

Or, you have to write even more software to have the inverter "learn" the characteristics of the motor, and adapt itself to them. And you have to test this software with a large enough range of motors so you know it actually works.

Are there any common, viable, off the shelf air cooled AC motors that
would be suitable for EV use?

Sure! Any standard off-the-shelf 3-phase 60hz motor of suitable HP could be used in an EV. It will be sub-optimal than a custom-designed motor. Limitations would be:

 - the wrong voltage (a 240vac motor would need a 360vdc pack)
 - not built for automotive use (insufficient cooling or protection
        from rain, dirt, etc.)
 - not balanced for higher than nameplate rpm (limited to ~3600 rpm)
 - not as efficient (since 99% of motor buyers ignore efficiency)
 - is built for sinewaves, not squarewave inverter use (needs extra
        insulation, better laminations, higher temp rating, etc.)

Thus, a regular 60hz motor would be bigger, heavier, less efficient, and not as reliable as a purpose-built motor. It still could be adequate if you were willing to accept these limitations.

You know, all you need to do is prototype the first one then contract
it out to an assembly shop and start selling inverters...

Sounds easy, doesn't it! :-) But for contract assembly to work, the design has to be so bulletproof that even the Three Stooges could build it correctly. It takes many trials (and errors!), with lots of scrap samples that "almost work" along the way.

Can a 3 phase inverter be built to drive any AC motor and not require
any software in it?

Yes. We've had inverters for AC motors for at least 40 years now, and until recently, none of them had micros or software.

Does someone here have the skills to design the inverter's circuit
board and component layout? Does another have the skills to write
the drive software for it?  All we need is something to get started
with and then we can fine tune/tweak/improve it.

I'm sure lots of people could do this. The challenge is to provide them with an *incentive* to do it! Maybe set up a "Tesla Prize" with some cash award for the best open source AC motor controller that meets your criteria. Must achieve a certain performance with a certain motor and certain battery pack voltage. Must provide the parts lists, schematics, PCB layouts, software listings. Winning design will be published, with credit to the author. That sort of thing.

Rewrite the book on 3 phase inverter motor speed controllers. Must
it REALLY be the hardware equivalent of 3 DC motor controllers?

No, of course not. There are plenty of single-phase and 2-phase inverters. It's just that for higher power more phases are better, 3-phase works well. Large DC motor commutators are actually polyphase inverters, with many more than 3 phases (their switches are so cheap that they don't need to limit them to only six).

Chop it, pulse it, route it? Why 3 separate controllers in one?
Why can't one drive all three phases?

You can. One viable strategy is to use a simple DC/DC converter (like a normal DC motor controller) to produce variable-voltage DC, then use a simple DC-to-AC inverter to convert this to AC. Toyota uses this approach in the Prius -- their DC/DC boosts the pack voltage, so they can use a higher-voltage AC motor with a lower-voltage pack.

How did GM do it in '66?

Almost exactly the same as the GM EV1! 3-phase AC inverter, only built with SCRs instead of IGBTs. The physical size and weight of the inverters was even the same. But that 1966 inverter was a NASA-grade cost-is-no-object piece of workmanship and perfection. The EV1 inverter used off-the-shelf parts and was probably 1/10th the cost.

Maybe someone in China for example has the skills and would be willing
to design an inverter for a nominal fee?  I'd put in some money if it
was assured of being designed.

I have the feeling that "American" means "fool with money" in Chinese. :-) There are of course skilled honest businessmen in China; but you are more likely to be preyed upon by the crooks because you can't tell the difference (until too late). You need to get to know the person, establish relationships, build up mutual trust. That takes time (and money).

Maybe old school it sans printed circuit board.

The high-power stuff isn't on PC boards; it's big chassis-mount parts, connected with buss bars or equivalent.

we need is the crudest, simplest AC motor speed controller to get
the ball rolling. Anyone?

You'd wind up with a brushed DC motor :-)

Seriously, I think the best option for what you want is to start with a mass-produced industrial inverter, meant to be powered by 240vac (which it immediately rectifies into ~360vdc) and which is meant to drive generic industrial 3-phase motors. They have already gotten the production volumes up (and so the price down), worked out the design bugs, perfected the self-tuning software, etc. All that's wrong is that is for motors of about 1/10th the desired horsepower.

Then replace its power stage with your own bigger power stage. This will be big chassis mount IGBT modules, buss bar wiring, etc. which is much more suitable for home construction. "Lie" to the drive about the actual motor voltage and current (for example, the drive sees 10 amps when the actual current is 100 amps).

How about for starters, just make an inverter to drive a single phase
motor?  Is there a big single phase motor that would be good enough to
power an EV? (three phase can come later if single will work for now)

Here too, you'll observe that cheap simple AC inverters are available, but they are terrible at driving motors. You need a much more expensive, much better inverter to drive motors successfully.

What are the various ways to control the rpm of an AC motor?
Voltage?  Current?  Frequency?

Lots of them, actually. The cheapest is just voltage control (like a light dimmer for a ceiling fan, or tapped windings like a furnace blower motor).

The best (but most complex) method is combined voltage and frequency control. This is what all the EV AC drives are doing. There are endless subtle variations.

Other alternatives exist. Everything that works for DC motors works for AC too. You can restrict motor speed range and use a transmission (it's already there in an EV conversion, after all). You can use consequent poles or multi-pole windings to change speeds in steps (2/4/6/8 pole). Wound rotor AC motors (the equivalent of sepex DC motors) can vary speed via slip power recovery.

Can for example, a 5hp air cooled AC motor be rewound for ANY voltage/frequency?

Certainly almost any sane voltage. I've rewound 120vac motors for 0.6vac, for example, and they work exactly the same; same speed, same efficiency; it just draws 200 times the current.

Changing frequency changes speed. The bearings, laminations, rotor balancing, etc. are all affected if you go up in speed. A normal 60hz 3450 rpm rotor might not hold together at 120hz 6900rpm, the bearings will last half as long, and the laminations will produce about twice the heat.

Are there any "simple" inverter systems on any of these new AC
forklifts and can anything be learned from those or are they typical
"black box" OEM type setups?  How much for an AC motor/inverter off
one of these lifts?

I don't know. Maybe someone in the forklift business can tell us.

If DC EV motors came from forklifts, where will the AC motors come
from and what are they currently being used in?

Not many applications yet; that's one reason they are so rare and expensive! If/when they find some big customers (maybe forklifts), then AC motors/controllers will come down in price and go up in availability.
--
Ring the bells that still can ring
Forget the perfect offering
There is a crack in everything
That's how the light gets in    --    Leonard Cohen
--
Lee A. Hart, 814 8th Ave N, Sartell MN 56377, leeahart_at_earthlink.net

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
See insert below.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Trefry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 11:23 AM
Subject: RE: Lithium-ion batteries & Valence Group buy


> I guess it would depend on what you mean by the cost still being high.
>
> I still have to figure out what the application would be.
>
> Which battery would I use to run my Porsche 914?
> How do I calculate how many I would need, at what amp?
> Are there any special considerations with these types of batteries over
> lead?
> (It says it can use a standard charger, so I don't know)
>
> I just got my books, so I'll be reading up on this stuff, but if these
> batteries will get me greater range/performance AND last longer, and are
> maintenance free (no watering) I'd be willing to pay up to 3X the cost of
> lead.
>
> Is that not high enough?

> Mike

  It would be about 40X times to be equal to my lead.

Also, I got a bid on supercapacitors from esma-cap.com for 40X times which 
would be 1/2 the range of my lead.

Roland
>
> > Subject: Re: Lithium-ion batteries & Valence Group buy
>
> > Hello Mike
>
> > I have been talking to Marc at Valence for a long time about their
> > batteries. They are all set up for an EV if we could get a serious group
> buy  going the
> > prices would still be high but I believe better than anything else out
> there
> > for the money.
>
> > Don
>
>
> 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Also, in some States if you have the tailgate down that extends beyond the 
bumber with out a flag warning to the driver behind you, it could cost you.

Ever try to get out of a parking spot with a tail gate down?

One guy hit my car with a extension unit sticking out beyond the bumper 
while backing up.  It cost him $2600.00.

Roland


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Death to All Spammers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 10:05 AM
Subject: Truck tailgate up vs down, Was=> Re: Ranger doner


> > Two different drivers in two different trucks, same make and model
> > though. One road test was not very scientific. The should have repeated
> > the test several times. Switching drivers and switching which truck had
> > the tailgate up or down. I have not statistical experience but I don't
> > think that one data point is enough to form more than a
> guess--certainly
> > not  a conclusion.
> >
>
> The Canadian wind tunnel testing previously mentioned was as
> scientific as any other, demonstrating an example of how wind vector
> variables can cause poor consistency of results.
>
>
>
>
> 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
A fellow EVer just told me about the Vicor chip.  600
watts beats the 350 I pull from my DCP.

The point?  Seems to me that the Vicor unit needs a
housing, a fuse, and perhaps a switch, depending on
whether one leaves in perpetually on, or switched off
per ignition switch.

Similarly, I like my DCP DCDC because it has a +/- 12V
line for the E-meter.  

Is there a market for someone to take the Vicor, take
the chip that runs our e-meters, put them on a board,
stick it in a case with applicable LEDs fuses, etc.
and get it on the market for around $469?

If someone wants to design the board and point me to a
heatsink that would work well for the model, I'd be
interested in soldering it up, and sticking it in a
box for sale.

I've also got the time over the summer to dedicate to
the cause...

Converting a gen. 5 Honda Civic?  My $20 video/DVD
has my '92 sedan, as well as a del Sol and hatch too! 
Learn more at:
www.budget.net/~bbath/CivicWithACord.html
                          ____ 
                     __/__|__\ __        
  =D-------/    -  -         \  
                     'O'-----'O'-'
Would you still drive your car if the tailpipe came out of the steering wheel? 
Are you saving any gas for your kids?

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
 
Hello Mike
 
It depends on what range you require from your EV and what motor you have  
decided on. 
 
I have only looked at AC systems and been driving them for several years so  
my understanding of DC systems is in the learning process. 
 
With Valence batteries they weigh a lot less than lead acid so you get  
better performance and longer range. It does come at a price though.  This is 
just 
a grab out of the air figure . If you  spent $2000 dollars in AGM 20 x $100 of 
100 ah batteries for your  vehicle you would have to spend around 24,000 to 
have the same Ah rating.  However it would not be the same vehicle it would 
have more range be faster  handle better and stop quicker. You could drop the 
24,000 price down more if you  built it to equal the performance of the lead 
acid 
batteries. Then all you would  gain is in the long run they would cost less 
because they have thousands of  cycles verses lead acids hundreds of cycles.
 
Also notice the Valance is rated at the C-5 most lead acid is rated at C-20  
both of these are lower than real EV use of C-1. I have only looked at the  
Valence for AC systems. Others could tell you if this is even an option for DC  
motors.
 
If you consider the life time use the Valence batteries will provide you it  
is actually less then lead it is just if one is willing to pay all the money 
up  front and receive the benefits of having less weight. 
 
Don
 
In a message dated 10/7/2006 10:24:46 AM Pacific Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I guess  it would depend on what you mean by the cost still being high.

I still  have to figure out what the application would be. 

Which battery would  I use to run my Porsche 914?
How do I calculate how many I would need, at  what amp?
Are there any special considerations with these types of  batteries over
lead?
(It says it can use a standard charger, so I don't  know)

I just got my books, so I'll be reading up on this stuff, but if  these 
batteries will get me greater range/performance AND last longer, and  are 
maintenance free (no watering) I'd be willing to pay up to 3X the cost  of
lead.

Is that not high enough?

Mike

> Subject:  Re: Lithium-ion batteries & Valence Group buy

> Hello  Mike

> I have been talking to Marc at Valence for a long time about  their  
> batteries. They are all set up for an EV if we could get  a serious group
buy  going the 
> prices would still be high but  I believe better than anything else out
there 
> for the  money.

> Don


 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
40X?!?! Even with a large group purchase? What the heck would it be if you
just bought the outright as an individual?

So you're saying that for me to buy the equivalent of about $1200 of lead
batteries, it would cost $48,000? Those 12v are over $2,000 a piece? At a
group discount?

I might as well pony up the extra money and buy a Tesla.

Grr... At this rate EVs will never take off.

More frustration and disappointment :(


[clipped] ... I'd be willing to pay up to 3X the cost of
> lead.
>
> Is that not high enough?

> Mike

  It would be about 40X times to be equal to my lead.

Also, I got a bid on supercapacitors from esma-cap.com for 40X times which 
would be 1/2 the range of my lead.

Roland
 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Lee Hart wrote: 

> Eric Poulsen wrote:
> > You don't really explain your desire for a new AC controller design.
> 
> I think it's fairly obvious. He wants a source for Ac motor 
> controllers that doesn't cost an arm and a leg.

I take Eric's question to be 'what are the attributes that are desired
in this new AC controller, that are not provided by present DC
controllers, or which attributes of existing AC controllers (if any) are
you willing to forego in this new design to reduce cost?'

For instance, there are simpler ways to control an AC motor than
software implementing field oriented control (FOC), however, this
approach may result in the most efficient and precise control.  If one
is not concerned with the absolute maximum efficiency, it might be
possible to implement a simpler control strategy (e.g.
frequency/voltage) without any software at all.

So, what are the attributes of an AC drivetrain that are absolutely
essential to justify its use over the lower cost DC alternative?  Regen
and/or wider speed range are the obvious ones, though the wider speed
range is really only possible with more expensive AC motors basically
purpose built for EV use since the common [inexpensive] 60Hz induction
machines are typically going to be limited to a similar or narrower
speed range than our series DC motors.

Knowing what features the simplified/cheaper inverter must
preserve/provide could help identify/narrow the field of possible
solutions to the problem.

Cheers,

Roger.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Thanks for that explanation, $24,000 is better than $48,000, however still
too high.

How much would it cost to bring the valence batteries inline with
performance and range of lead, and how would that be achieved? Fewer
batteries? Lower amp battery (I noticed they have several versions with
different amps).

I'm not sure what the C ratings mean, I'm still learning.

Thanks,

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 2:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Lithium-ion batteries & Valence Group buy

 
Hello Mike
 
It depends on what range you require from your EV and what motor you have  
decided on. 
 
I have only looked at AC systems and been driving them for several years so

my understanding of DC systems is in the learning process. 
 
With Valence batteries they weigh a lot less than lead acid so you get  
better performance and longer range. It does come at a price though.  This
is just 
a grab out of the air figure . If you  spent $2000 dollars in AGM 20 x $100
of 
100 ah batteries for your  vehicle you would have to spend around 24,000 to 
have the same Ah rating.  However it would not be the same vehicle it would 
have more range be faster  handle better and stop quicker. You could drop
the 
24,000 price down more if you  built it to equal the performance of the lead
acid 
batteries. Then all you would  gain is in the long run they would cost less 
because they have thousands of  cycles verses lead acids hundreds of cycles.
 
Also notice the Valance is rated at the C-5 most lead acid is rated at C-20

both of these are lower than real EV use of C-1. I have only looked at the  
Valence for AC systems. Others could tell you if this is even an option for
DC  
motors.
 
If you consider the life time use the Valence batteries will provide you it

is actually less then lead it is just if one is willing to pay all the money

up  front and receive the benefits of having less weight. 
 
Don
 
 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
 
The C rating is how long (hours) the battery will last. If taken  faster then 
the rated C rating the battery will provide much less.
 
You need to study Ah ratings and compare. A 100 Ah battery at the C20 rate  
may only be 60 or less of Ah at the 1 C rate. 
 
Don
 
In a message dated 10/7/2006 11:21:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Thanks  for that explanation, $24,000 is better than $48,000, however still
too  high.

How much would it cost to bring the valence batteries inline  with
performance and range of lead, and how would that be achieved?  Fewer
batteries? Lower amp battery (I noticed they have several versions  with
different amps).

I'm not sure what the C ratings mean, I'm  still learning.

Thanks,

Mike

-----Original  Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 2:09 PM
To:  [email protected]
Subject: Re: Lithium-ion batteries & Valence Group  buy


Hello Mike

It depends on what range you require from  your EV and what motor you have  
decided on. 

I have only  looked at AC systems and been driving them for several years so

my  understanding of DC systems is in the learning process. 

With Valence  batteries they weigh a lot less than lead acid so you get  
better  performance and longer range. It does come at a price though.  This
is  just 
a grab out of the air figure . If you  spent $2000 dollars in  AGM 20 x $100
of 
100 ah batteries for your  vehicle you would have  to spend around 24,000 to 
have the same Ah rating.  However it would  not be the same vehicle it would 
have more range be faster  handle  better and stop quicker. You could drop
the 
24,000 price down more if  you  built it to equal the performance of the lead
acid 
batteries.  Then all you would  gain is in the long run they would cost less  
because they have thousands of  cycles verses lead acids hundreds of  cycles.

Also notice the Valance is rated at the C-5 most lead acid is  rated at C-20

both of these are lower than real EV use of C-1. I have  only looked at the  
Valence for AC systems. Others could tell you if  this is even an option for
DC  
motors.

If you consider the  life time use the Valence batteries will provide you it

is actually  less then lead it is just if one is willing to pay all the  money

up  front and receive the benefits of having less weight.  

Don





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 3 Oct 2006 at 8:31, jerryd wrote:

> It's nice when 2 people can
> just pick it up because it's so light.

The Mini-Evergreen bodyshell was so light that one person could carry it - 
standing on one foot.  

http://www.solarmobil.net/mini05.jpg

This is the car that Axel Krause drove over the Alps on one charge.  I wish 
these were still available.  I probably couldn't afford one though. 


David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA
EV List Assistant Administrator

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Want to unsubscribe, stop the EV list mail while you're on vacation,
or switch to digest mode?  See how: http://www.evdl.org/help/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 
Note: mail sent to "evpost" or "etpost" addresses will not reach me.  
To send a private message, please obtain my email address from
the webpage http://www.evdl.org/help/ .
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
From:
http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/10/06/2024229

"I just finished watching 'Who Killed the Electric Car', and was quite
impressed. I'm too poor to buy anything but an old clunker, and not eager to
pollute the atmosphere (or empty my wallet) with gasoline. The movie inspired
me: I think I'd like to convert an old car (or perhaps a motorbike) to run on
electricity. Have Slashdot readers attempted such a thing before? What
experiences have you had, and what would you recommend or not recommend?"

Thanks!

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Usually I can read your ascii drawings but not today ;) I'll try and
understand it more later. For now I'll address your comments below.

I cut and paste everything into Notepad and now the light goes on :)

I'll bread board your's up and see how it goes.

Thanks Loads Lee!

Lee Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>   - D1 is backwards

Could be. I made a functional circuit then drew the schematic.

>   - R6 is unnecessary

It made the led come on from the off state very slowly. If I can get
rid of it, that would be fine.

>   - it requires a regulated power supply (not shown)

Correct. I want it to have a stable base of voltage from which to operate.

>   - high power consumption from the battery

As designed it draws from the pack 3ma at 15v and around 1-2ma at 10v.
The regulated power requirement are around 15ma with 1 led lit to full
brightness.

>   - poor temperature stability

Don't know yet. Could be. I'll find out with more testing.

>   - no noise filtering

Correct. But I just needed to test the concept before making it bullet
proof.


> If this is all you want to do, try this circuit I posted back in
July 2004:
> 
>        _________________________
>       |    D1   |               |
>       |  6.8v  _|_/    U1       > R2
>       | zener //_\   __|\|__    > 2.2k
>    +__|__       |   |  |/|  |   >
> 12v ___      A |___|       |___| B
>    -  |         |   |  U2   |   |
>       |         >   |__|/|__|  _|_/ D2
>       |   R3    > R1   |\|    //_\  6.8v
>       |   100   > 2.2k          |   zener
>       |__/\/\___|_______________|
> 
> U1 and U2 are the LEDs of darlington optocouplers. U1 lights for high 
> battery voltages; U2 for low. Pick optos with high gain (high CTR) to 
> minimize load current on the 12v battery and to make the dash LEDs as 
> bright as possible. Pick the zeners and resistors to get the desired 
> thresholds and to set how gradually you want the LEDs to light up as
the 
> voltages change.
> 
> The dash display could use a single LED, or 2-wire red/green LEDs, or 
> 3-wire red/green LEDs, or of course 2 separate LEDs.
> 
> 3-wire red/green LED       2-wire red/green LED:      single LED
> or separate hi/low LEDs                               fault indicator
> 
> +12v_________           +12v__________________        +12v________
>        |      |                |               |             |     |
>   U1 |/     |/ U2              >     green     >        U1 |/    |/ U2
>      |\     |\              1k >    __|\|__    > 1k        |\    |\
>       _|_    _|_               >   |  |/|  |   <             |_____|
>      _\_/_  _\_/_              |___|       |___|               _|_
> green |______| red            |   |  red  |   |        fault _\_/_
>           |                    |   |__|/|__|   |          LED   |
>           >                  |/       |\|    |/                 >
>        1k >                  |\ U2        U1 |\              1k >
>           >              GND___|_______________|                >
> GND______|                                            GND______|
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ring the bells that still can ring
> Forget the perfect offering
> There is a crack in everything
> That's how the light gets in    --    Leonard Cohen
> --
> Lee A. Hart, 814 8th Ave N, Sartell MN 56377, leeahart_at_earthlink.net
>




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Mike, as long as your expectations are the up to the standard and price of
gas cars, you will be continued to be disappointed and frustrated. 

To get a basic understanding which will help your questions:
 - read the FAQ at evparts.com
 - read the resources at evalbum.com
 - read through this EVDL archive - your questions are asked often
 - use google - there are a lot of great EV sites


This is what it boils down to:
- Hobbyist EVs are rarely cost effective
- The range is not very good - at best a commuter car 
- If you want better range you have to spend a lot of money


However:
- there are fast drag race EVs (they do cost money though!)
- EVs do not pollute
- EVs have very little maintenance
- are not dependant on foreign oil
- the fuel for EVs can be made at your own home






 


Don Cameron, Victoria, BC, Canada
 
see the New Beetle EV project   www.cameronsoftware.com/ev

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Trefry
Sent: October 7, 2006 11:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Lithium-ion batteries & Valence Group buy

40X?!?! Even with a large group purchase? What the heck would it be if you
just bought the outright as an individual?

So you're saying that for me to buy the equivalent of about $1200 of lead
batteries, it would cost $48,000? Those 12v are over $2,000 a piece? At a
group discount?

I might as well pony up the extra money and buy a Tesla.

Grr... At this rate EVs will never take off.

More frustration and disappointment :(


[clipped] ... I'd be willing to pay up to 3X the cost of
> lead.
>
> Is that not high enough?

> Mike

  It would be about 40X times to be equal to my lead.

Also, I got a bid on supercapacitors from esma-cap.com for 40X times which
would be 1/2 the range of my lead.

Roland
 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
 
It is not 40 times as much. I would say it is around 10 times or less  taking 
into account lead acid batteries and not very often rated at C-5. 
 
Here is the big difference your 12 lead acid batteries are going to weigh 8  
or 9 hundred pounds. The 12 Valence batteries weigh 420 pounds. 
 
Don
 
In a message dated 10/7/2006 11:12:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

40X?!?!  Even with a large group purchase? What the heck would it be if you
just  bought the outright as an individual?

So you're saying that for me to  buy the equivalent of about $1200 of lead
batteries, it would cost $48,000?  Those 12v are over $2,000 a piece? At a
group discount?

I might as  well pony up the extra money and buy a Tesla.

Grr... At this rate EVs  will never take off.

More frustration and disappointment  :(


[clipped] ... I'd be willing to pay up to 3X the cost of
>  lead.
>
> Is that not high enough?

> Mike

It would be about 40X times to be equal to my lead.

Also, I got a bid  on supercapacitors from esma-cap.com for 40X times which 
would be 1/2 the  range of my lead.

Roland




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
 
Great advice from Don Cameron. 
 
I think your first EV should be with AGM batteries so you can get some  
experience of real world results. You have not said what your budget is but  
starting with the Valence battery is like buying a 100,000 dollar sports car as 
 
your first vehicle. It comes down to what one can pay and even if one could  
would it be a good idea?
 
Don
 
In a message dated 10/7/2006 11:21:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Thanks  for that explanation, $24,000 is better than $48,000, however still
too  high.

How much would it cost to bring the valence batteries inline  with
performance and range of lead, and how would that be achieved?  Fewer
batteries? Lower amp battery (I noticed they have several versions  with
different amps).

I'm not sure what the C ratings mean, I'm  still learning.

Thanks,

Mike

-----Original  Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 2:09 PM
To:  [email protected]
Subject: Re: Lithium-ion batteries & Valence Group  buy


Hello Mike

It depends on what range you require from  your EV and what motor you have  
decided on. 

I have only  looked at AC systems and been driving them for several years so

my  understanding of DC systems is in the learning process. 

With Valence  batteries they weigh a lot less than lead acid so you get  
better  performance and longer range. It does come at a price though.  This
is  just 
a grab out of the air figure . If you  spent $2000 dollars in  AGM 20 x $100
of 
100 ah batteries for your  vehicle you would have  to spend around 24,000 to 
have the same Ah rating.  However it would  not be the same vehicle it would 
have more range be faster  handle  better and stop quicker. You could drop
the 
24,000 price down more if  you  built it to equal the performance of the lead
acid 
batteries.  Then all you would  gain is in the long run they would cost less  
because they have thousands of  cycles verses lead acids hundreds of  cycles.

Also notice the Valance is rated at the C-5 most lead acid is  rated at C-20

both of these are lower than real EV use of C-1. I have  only looked at the  
Valence for AC systems. Others could tell you if  this is even an option for
DC  
motors.

If you consider the  life time use the Valence batteries will provide you it

is actually  less then lead it is just if one is willing to pay all the  money

up  front and receive the benefits of having less weight.  

Don




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I'm looking for some design advice on batteries.

First off, I have a strong inclination toward SAFT NiCd simply for the longevity reason. In a nutshell, I need some help figuring out whether these cells will provide the performance I desire and at what cost. The bottom line on performance and range desired is 20-30 miles and at least stock-like acceleration for highway merges. Anything in excess of that is considered gravy and may be fitted as space and budget permits.

I look at it this way: The car may rot to the ground 10 years from now, but it would be nice to have a conversion worthy of transplanting to another chassis should the need arise.

So assuming an unstripped chassis weight of around 2400 lbs (guessing 2050 stripped):

- How many cells should I use at what pack voltage?
- Will I need a controller with current amplification and voltage stepdown to get good performance out the pack?
- Where can I get the cells and at what cost?

Obviously I know that my low rpm torque is going to be limited by the lesser of motor (probably a 9"), controller (hopefully a Z1k), or battery power, but I'd like to have a little headroom available from all three. A top speed of 80 mph would be plenty.

95% of the time, this car won't travel more than 10 miles in a day and will typically only travel about 5 miles at less than 45mph. So the extended range driving does not necessarily have to include the higher performance.

I also need to know if there are special design considerations I should take with respect to charging, heat, and expansion. In other words, can a charger like a PFC provide a safe charge without cooking the cells, and what cooling is necessary?

Thanks!
-
Kip
Eugene, OR
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- I'm kind of amazed at the price of even current ultra caps to get even 1/2 of the range. Do capacitors have a charge cycle rating? What are the issues that are going to come up with using these instead of batteries? They are only going to get cheaper and better suited for something like this.

Ian


On Oct 7, 2006, at 11.50 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Great advice from Don Cameron.

I think your first EV should be with AGM batteries so you can get some
experience of real world results. You have not said what your budget is but starting with the Valence battery is like buying a 100,000 dollar sports car as your first vehicle. It comes down to what one can pay and even if one could
would it be a good idea?

Don

In a message dated 10/7/2006 11:21:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Thanks for that explanation, $24,000 is better than $48,000, however still
too  high.

How much would it cost to bring the valence batteries inline  with
performance and range of lead, and how would that be achieved?  Fewer
batteries? Lower amp battery (I noticed they have several versions with
different amps).

I'm not sure what the C ratings mean, I'm  still learning.

Thanks,

Mike

-----Original  Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 2:09 PM
To:  [email protected]
Subject: Re: Lithium-ion batteries & Valence Group  buy


Hello Mike

It depends on what range you require from your EV and what motor you have
decided on.

I have only looked at AC systems and been driving them for several years so

my  understanding of DC systems is in the learning process.

With Valence batteries they weigh a lot less than lead acid so you get better performance and longer range. It does come at a price though. This
is  just
a grab out of the air figure . If you spent $2000 dollars in AGM 20 x $100
of
100 ah batteries for your vehicle you would have to spend around 24,000 to have the same Ah rating. However it would not be the same vehicle it would have more range be faster handle better and stop quicker. You could drop
the
24,000 price down more if you built it to equal the performance of the lead
acid
batteries. Then all you would gain is in the long run they would cost less because they have thousands of cycles verses lead acids hundreds of cycles.

Also notice the Valance is rated at the C-5 most lead acid is rated at C-20

both of these are lower than real EV use of C-1. I have only looked at the Valence for AC systems. Others could tell you if this is even an option for
DC
motors.

If you consider the life time use the Valence batteries will provide you it

is actually less then lead it is just if one is willing to pay all the money

up  front and receive the benefits of having less weight.

Don





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
 
Hello Kip
 
You might be a little high on your starting weight. I have used this site  to 
find vehicle information _http://www.carsplusplus.com/brands/index.php_ 
(http://www.carsplusplus.com/brands/index.php) 
 
They have listed a 1984 at 2116 pounds and the 1986 supercharged at 2259  
pounds. 
 
I don't think you can use the PFC charger on NiCad batteries. If your  
serious about that battery I do have a Brusa charger that is set up for 120 
volt  
SAFT batteries. 
 
Since your in Oregon I will let you know I have a 1998 Factory EV Ranger  
that has brand new 12 volt batteries that I would sell to you for 15,000  
dollars. It has 7000 miles on it and 50 to 60 miles range. It is even in your  
area 
now check out this site _http://southtownelanes.com/electric_pickups.html_ 
(http://southtownelanes.com/electric_pickups.html) 
 
The blue one in the picture looks just like the one I have for sale. You  
could buy the whole vehicle for the price of just the SAFT batteries.
 
Don
 
 
 
In a message dated 10/7/2006 12:12:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I'm  looking for some design advice on batteries.

First off, I have a strong  inclination toward SAFT NiCd simply for the 
longevity reason.  In a  nutshell, I need some help figuring out whether 
these cells will provide  the performance I desire and at what cost.  The 
bottom line on  performance and range desired is 20-30 miles and at least 
stock-like  acceleration for highway merges.  Anything in excess of that is  
considered gravy and may be fitted as space and budget permits.

I  look at it this way:  The car may rot to the ground 10 years from now,  
but 
it would be nice to have a conversion worthy of transplanting to  another 
chassis should the need arise.

So assuming an unstripped  chassis weight of around 2400 lbs (guessing 2050 
stripped):

- How  many cells should I use at what pack voltage?
- Will I need a controller  with current amplification and voltage stepdown 
to get good performance  out the pack?
- Where can I get the cells and at what  cost?

Obviously I know that my low rpm torque is going to be limited by  the lesser 
of motor (probably a 9"), controller (hopefully a Z1k), or  battery power, 
but I'd like to have a little headroom available from all  three.  A top 
speed of 80 mph would be plenty.

95% of the  time, this car won't travel more than 10 miles in a day and will 
typically  only travel about 5 miles at less than 45mph.  So the extended 
range  driving does not necessarily have to include the higher performance.

I  also need to know if there are special design considerations I should take 
 
with respect to charging, heat, and expansion.  In other words, can a  
charger like a PFC provide a safe charge without cooking the cells, and  what 
cooling is necessary?

Thanks!
-
Kip
Eugene, OR  



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
So, is there anyone I can contact about getting some Saft flooded NiCd's?
In this case, I specifically need pricing to replace my BB600 cells that were destroyed in my shop fire. (SG Photo doesn't seem to actually have any, even though they are listed on their web site.)
--
John G. Lussmyer      mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dragons soar and Tigers prowl while I dream....         
http://www.CasaDelGato.com

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I'm not sure I can answer your questions, but I think
I can provide a data point.  I'll talk (from memory)
about Bill Dube's VW rabbit convertable, with an ADC
8" motor, 1200A grizburger controller, and (I believe)
144V of saft NiCds.  He drives to work and back, runs
trips over lunch, 5 days a week, about 28 miles each
way.  He used brand new Saft NiCds, the water cooled
kind designed for EV use.  I think 100 Ah?  I think
they cost about $10k?  I think he has about 30k miles
and still going strong, even in the cold winter.  It
is expected to get 100K miles out of the pack, if
stupid user mistakes don't kill them...  The car
definetly has more power/acceleration than the stock
gas engine.  I think he tells people it has 40 to 80
mile range, depending on driving style.  This is in
colorado, and the big hills are not a problem.  I
personally believe water cooled nicds are the way to
go; it helps keep them extreemly balanced.  The cells
are always within a few milivolts of each other.  But
water cooling is a pain; lots of connections that can
leak.  These batteries also have an automatic
wattering system, where you put distilled water in one
end, and when a cell is "full", it bypasses the
incomming water to the next cell, as to not over
dilute that cell.  

I will need a higher voltage for my AC drive than I
have room for to use these batteries.  If they came in
1/3 the Ah and 1/3 the size, and 1/3 the price, I
would have bought a set myself.

- Steven Ciciora

--- Kip C Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm looking for some design advice on batteries.
> 
> First off, I have a strong inclination toward SAFT
> NiCd simply for the 
> longevity reason.  In a nutshell, I need some help
> figuring out whether 
> these cells will provide the performance I desire
> and at what cost.  The 
> bottom line on performance and range desired is
> 20-30 miles and at least 
> stock-like acceleration for highway merges. 
> Anything in excess of that is 
> considered gravy and may be fitted as space and
> budget permits.
> 
> I look at it this way:  The car may rot to the
> ground 10 years from now, but 
> it would be nice to have a conversion worthy of
> transplanting to another 
> chassis should the need arise.
> 
> So assuming an unstripped chassis weight of around
> 2400 lbs (guessing 2050 
> stripped):
> 
> - How many cells should I use at what pack voltage?
> - Will I need a controller with current
> amplification and voltage stepdown 
> to get good performance out the pack?
> - Where can I get the cells and at what cost?
> 
> Obviously I know that my low rpm torque is going to
> be limited by the lesser 
> of motor (probably a 9"), controller (hopefully a
> Z1k), or battery power, 
> but I'd like to have a little headroom available
> from all three.  A top 
> speed of 80 mph would be plenty.
> 
> 95% of the time, this car won't travel more than 10
> miles in a day and will 
> typically only travel about 5 miles at less than
> 45mph.  So the extended 
> range driving does not necessarily have to include
> the higher performance.
> 
> I also need to know if there are special design
> considerations I should take 
> with respect to charging, heat, and expansion.  In
> other words, can a 
> charger like a PFC provide a safe charge without
> cooking the cells, and what 
> cooling is necessary?
> 
> Thanks!
> -
> Kip
> Eugene, OR 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to