EV Digest 6116

Topics covered in this issue include:

  1) Re: Battery standing voltage question
        by "Roland Wiench" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  2) Re: Battery standing voltage question
        by <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  3) Curtis Sepex motor controllers up on Aussie Ebay
        by James Massey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  4) Re: Phoenix Motorcars Takes SEMA Show by Storm
        by "Lawrence Rhodes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  5) RE: Curtis Sepex motor controllers up on Aussie Ebay
        by Cor van de Water <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  6) Re: Fox News falls for Steorn
        by "Lawrence Rhodes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  7) RE: Phoenix Motorcars Takes SEMA Show by Storm
        by Mike Willmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  8) Multiple NEDRA records
        by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  9) RE: OT: Fox News falls for Steorn
        by "Phil Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 10) Re: Fox News falls for Steorn
        by "Mark McCurdy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 11) EBEAA Meeting - next Saturday, Nov 18, 2006 10-12 in Alameda
        by Ed Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 12) Re: Renewable Energy Idea, an' More!
        by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 13) Re: Battery standing voltage question
        by "Roland Wiench" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 14) Re: Renewable Energy Idea, an' More!
        by "Roland Wiench" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 15) Re: Was motor roughness - Now Raptor Issue?
        by "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 16) Re: Multiple NEDRA records
        by Jack Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 17) Re: Fox News falls for Steorn
        by "Peter VanDerWal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 18) IGBT info
        by "Obrien, Haskell W." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 19) Re: OT: Fox News falls for Steorn
        by Eric Poulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 20) Xebra Glider
        by "Lawrence Rhodes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 21) Re: Phoenix Motorcars Takes SEMA Show by Storm
        by "Rich Rudman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 22) The story about Th!nk Nordic
        by Arne Magnus Berge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 23) Re: Multiple NEDRA records
        by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 24) Re: Multiple NEDRA records
        by "Rich Rudman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Begin Message ---
Hello John,

There may be a Discharge Floor  (or minimum limit that you fuel gage or 
E-meter may be set at).

If the E-meter has a Discharge Floor of 100% meaning it displays the full 
100% range of the AH of the battery as for example for a 100 AH battery:

Battery charge to 100% is 100% display or 0 AH used on the meter.

Battery discharge to 50% is 50% display or 50 AH used or remaining on the 
meter.

If the Discharge Floor is set to 50% and the battery is at 100% charge, it 
will also read 100% on the E-meter but when the battery is discharge to 50%, 
this will read 0% on the meter.

I have the same type of batteries you have, T-145's which are 260 AH.  If I 
set the AH and the Discharge Floor on a Link-10 E-meter to 100% and 
discharge to 80% remaining, the E-meter shows about 52 AH use or 260 AH x 
20% = 52 AH

If I set the E-meter to a Discharge Floor to 50%, then the E-meter displays 
26 AH use at 80%  or

260 x 50%= 130 AH, then:

130 AH x 20% = 26 AH use which is display as 80% on the E-meter.

The 26 AH is actually 90% of the capacity of the battery but it displays as 
80% on the battery.

I rather leave the Discharge Floor at 100% and never discharge below 50% 
which would be about 130 AH left in the battery or if one battery reads 
about 6.01 volts at no load what ever comes first.

Roland




----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:14 PM
Subject: Battery standing voltage question


> Hi All,
>
> I have been taking short runs with the electric bike and have come to a
> question about the standing voltage readings I am getting.
> Specs. Trojan T145 floodies
> running a 48 volt system, and charging in parallel 24 volt string.
> I have a Curtis "battery fuel gauge" which I think is actually just a
> minimum recording volt meter.
>
> After a 5 to 10 mile ride,  the "fuel gauge" reads anywhere from 1/3 to 
> 3/4
> full.  But when I read the voltage with a DMM I read 80 to 95% charged 
> based
> on a chart that I downloaded from Trojan's website.
>
> I understand that the instructions are to not measure the voltage just 
> after
> a charge or a discharge.  I expected that to be because just after a 
> charge
> the voltage would be overly high and that just after the discharge that it
> would be falsely low.
>
> My current draw is 80-125 amps as I cruise and can surge to 300+ on
> acceleration.  I expect that I am getting bit by Puekerts effect on the 
> fuel
> gauge.  My basic question is does a heavy discharge cause an overly high
> standing voltage reading?  I have taken the readings anywhere from 15
> minutes to the following day with similar results.
>
> respectfully,
> John Neiswanger
>
> 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Roland,

Its not an e-meter type device, just a cheap battery fuel gauge. It has a couple of adjustment pots, but they are only 270 deg units and not well calibrated. It is designed for a forklift to shut off a lift motor when the battery reaches a minimum volts per cell. I think it is set for 1.75 VPC from the factory or what is supposed to be 80% discharge. I did not connect the interlock as I am only using the unit as an indicator and I don't have a lift to shut off.

I think the meter is basically showing a minimum voltage so that if the VPC drops to say 2.05 it moves to the left to that point and doesn't move back up until it is reset by a charge or power cycle. Then on the next acceleration if the voltage goes down to say 1.98 then the meter moves a little farther to the left. I think there is some damping in the electronics as I don't see the needle move on accel. It just seems that it is dropping faster than the standing voltages that I am reading.

I think my question is about the "don't measure the voltage right after a discharge", is that admonishment because the voltage reading would be incorrect to the low side? I thought I understood that the voltage will rise to some extent after a discharge is stopped.

I may just need to tube the "fuel gauge" and get a straight DC voltmeter and learn the voltage limits. I am not yet ready to go for the Link 10 or E-meter route as I hope to get to that level with the Tropica chassis for my next conversion/restoration.

respectfully,
John Neiswanger

http://www.indele.com/ANOTHER.htm

----- Original Message ----- From: "Roland Wiench" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: Battery standing voltage question


Hello John,

There may be a Discharge Floor (or minimum limit that you fuel gage or E-meter may be set at).

If the E-meter has a Discharge Floor of 100% meaning it displays the full 100% range of the AH of the battery as for example for a 100 AH battery:

Battery charge to 100% is 100% display or 0 AH used on the meter.

Battery discharge to 50% is 50% display or 50 AH used or remaining on the meter.

If the Discharge Floor is set to 50% and the battery is at 100% charge, it will also read 100% on the E-meter but when the battery is discharge to 50%, this will read 0% on the meter.

I have the same type of batteries you have, T-145's which are 260 AH. If I set the AH and the Discharge Floor on a Link-10 E-meter to 100% and discharge to 80% remaining, the E-meter shows about 52 AH use or 260 AH x 20% = 52 AH

If I set the E-meter to a Discharge Floor to 50%, then the E-meter displays 26 AH use at 80% or

260 x 50%= 130 AH, then:

130 AH x 20% = 26 AH use which is display as 80% on the E-meter.

The 26 AH is actually 90% of the capacity of the battery but it displays as 80% on the battery.

I rather leave the Discharge Floor at 100% and never discharge below 50% which would be about 130 AH left in the battery or if one battery reads about 6.01 volts at no load what ever comes first.

Roland




----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:14 PM
Subject: Battery standing voltage question


Hi All,

I have been taking short runs with the electric bike and have come to a
question about the standing voltage readings I am getting.
Specs. Trojan T145 floodies
running a 48 volt system, and charging in parallel 24 volt string.
I have a Curtis "battery fuel gauge" which I think is actually just a
minimum recording volt meter.

After a 5 to 10 mile ride, the "fuel gauge" reads anywhere from 1/3 to 3/4 full. But when I read the voltage with a DMM I read 80 to 95% charged based
on a chart that I downloaded from Trojan's website.

I understand that the instructions are to not measure the voltage just after a charge or a discharge. I expected that to be because just after a charge the voltage would be overly high and that just after the discharge that it
would be falsely low.

My current draw is 80-125 amps as I cruise and can surge to 300+ on
acceleration. I expect that I am getting bit by Puekerts effect on the fuel
gauge.  My basic question is does a heavy discharge cause an overly high
standing voltage reading?  I have taken the readings anywhere from 15
minutes to the following day with similar results.

respectfully,
John Neiswanger





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
G'day all

Aussie Ebay: ebay.com.au have a couple of Curtis Sepex controllers, 24 to 36V 400A

http://search.ebay.com.au/search/search.dll?from=R40&satitle=DC+motor+controller

Item # 190048365243
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Curtis-Sepex-dc-electric-motor-controller_W0QQitemZ190048365243QQihZ009QQcategoryZ294QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

and item # 190048365314
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Curtis-Sepex-dc-electric-motor-controller_W0QQitemZ190048365314QQihZ009QQcategoryZ294QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

So what are they suitable for?

Regards

[Technik] James

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
The other advantage of quick charging is a smaller charger & pack.  You will
save on battery cost.  Lawrence Rhodes.......
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: Phoenix Motorcars Takes SEMA Show by Storm


> The PDF data sheet indicates 10 minutes to 90%.
>
> http://www.altairnano.com/documents/060926HOUSECARBZEV.pdf
>
> Ken
>
>
> In a message dated 11/8/2006 5:56:06 PM Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Good point.
>
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 2:52 pm, Paschke, Stephen wrote:
> > We heard about this on this list in a press release a few months ago.
> > There was a lot of "I'll believe it when I see it."
> > I still say prove it.  I'm sure that is not a full charge.  Maybe 80%
> > or
> > the top 5%?
> > Remember they said "as little as".
> >
> >>  Stephen Paschke
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Forklift. Or NEV / GolfCart.
You could run a motor-cycle with such a controller,
but for a car it is usually too little power,
unless you are OK with a car that can't go on the Freeway
or one that is extremely small and light and aerodynamic
and has a 0-60 expressed in minutes ;-}

That is why Electro Automotive recommends to have 96V or more
and the 600A of the haviest Curtis 1231 seems to be regarded
as pretty light by most converters.

Cor van de Water
Systems Architect
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Private: http://www.cvandewater.com
Skype: cor_van_de_water    IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel:   +1 408 542 5225     VoIP: +31 20 3987567 FWD# 25925
Fax:   +1 408 731 3675     eFAX: +31-87-784-1130
Proxim Wireless Networks   eFAX: +1-610-423-5743
Take your network further  http://www.proxim.com


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of James Massey
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 11:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Curtis Sepex motor controllers up on Aussie Ebay


G'day all

Aussie Ebay: ebay.com.au have a couple of Curtis Sepex controllers, 24 to 
36V 400A

http://search.ebay.com.au/search/search.dll?from=R40&satitle=DC+motor+contro
ller

Item # 190048365243
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Curtis-Sepex-dc-electric-motor-controller_W0QQitemZ19
0048365243QQihZ009QQcategoryZ294QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

and item # 190048365314
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Curtis-Sepex-dc-electric-motor-controller_W0QQitemZ19
0048365314QQihZ009QQcategoryZ294QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

So what are they suitable for?

Regards

[Technik] James

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
It either works or it doesn't.  If it does I'll be first in line.  If not so
what.  It doesn't bother me a bit.  I thought their challenge to the
scientific world was fair.   Lawrence Rhodes....
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Danny Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 9:24 PM
Subject: OT: Fox News falls for Steorn


> Hey look, I guess everybody can use "magnetic free energy" to power
> their EVs now.
> Fox News' Neil Cavuto featured it, so it must be true!
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WV4Ja5Cjtvc
>
> I think the nation is a bit stupider for having watched this.
>
> Danny
>

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
To pump 34KWH into a pack in 1 hour you would need a 34KW charger and at say 
192V it would push ~180A. To do it in 10 minutes you
need a 204KW charger and at say 192V it would push over 1000A.  Thats not a 
small charger :-(

but it would be impressive, and almost as much so to charge in 10 minutes.

Mike
Anchorage, Ak.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Lawrence Rhodes
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:34 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Phoenix Motorcars Takes SEMA Show by Storm
>
>
> The other advantage of quick charging is a smaller charger & pack.  You will
> save on battery cost.  Lawrence Rhodes.......
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 5:16 PM
> Subject: Re: Phoenix Motorcars Takes SEMA Show by Storm
>
>
> > The PDF data sheet indicates 10 minutes to 90%.
> >
> > http://www.altairnano.com/documents/060926HOUSECARBZEV.pdf
> >
> > Ken
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 11/8/2006 5:56:06 PM Central Standard Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Good point.
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 2:52 pm, Paschke, Stephen wrote:
> > > We heard about this on this list in a press release a few months ago.
> > > There was a lot of "I'll believe it when I see it."
> > > I still say prove it.  I'm sure that is not a full charge.  Maybe 80%
> > > or
> > > the top 5%?
> > > Remember they said "as little as".
> > >
> > >>  Stephen Paschke
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- I was just perusing the NEDRA sight and realized a current trend. A few vehicles are switching voltages up and down and gobbling up alot of the records. I understand in a free world to the victor goes the spoils but it makes me kinda sad. I always enjoyed checking out the record list of names from all different places, times, and configurations. Maybe it's just that I noticed my mother's 96 volt SC record got wiped recently. Are there any NEDRA limitations to how many voltage classes can be held by one vehicle? I have no doubt for instance that Dennis could take the CE dragster from top to bottom any day of the week he chooses, (Oops I forgot he's not a member), but you get my point. I have time slips to show the Orange Juice running WAY faster than some of the lower voltage records but since I had my sights on Ken and Jim's 240 volt number I never turned them in. Does anyone else feel this way or am I just too sentimental?

Shawn Lawless

PS: I guess it's out with the Zapi and lead, in with contactors and V28's, and down to Battery Beach with the Electropolitan to grab back that 96 volt record. Wanna go to Florida mom?
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---



From: Danny Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: OT: Fox News falls for Steorn
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:24:36 -0600

Hey look, I guess everybody can use "magnetic free energy" to power their EVs now.
Fox News' Neil Cavuto featured it, so it must be true!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WV4Ja5Cjtvc

I think the nation is a bit stupider for having watched this.

Danny

It may just be that Fox viewers ( as well as reporters) are a bit stupider to start with.

Phil

_________________________________________________________________
Stay in touch with old friends and meet new ones with Windows Live Spaces http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp0070000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mkt=en-us
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- device produces a magnetic field that magically produces small amounts of electricity when moved around.

mmm, don't you get a bit of electricity when you move one magnetic field through another?
isn't the earth surrounded by a huge magnetic field?
wouldn't there be drag when moving the one field through the other?

there's no free energy, to get it, you have to move the magnetic field, which will consume more energy than is created

reminds me of the people that suggest putting windmills on electric cars so you can produce the electricity to run the car 0-o

----- Original Message ----- From: "Lawrence Rhodes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 3:44 AM
Subject: Re: Fox News falls for Steorn


It either works or it doesn't. If it does I'll be first in line. If not so
what.  It doesn't bother me a bit.  I thought their challenge to the
scientific world was fair.   Lawrence Rhodes....
----- Original Message ----- From: "Danny Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 9:24 PM
Subject: OT: Fox News falls for Steorn


Hey look, I guess everybody can use "magnetic free energy" to power
their EVs now.
Fox News' Neil Cavuto featured it, so it must be true!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WV4Ja5Cjtvc

I think the nation is a bit stupider for having watched this.

Danny



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
*********START OF MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT***********
Topic: EVs for Dummies: The Electrathon
Date: Saturday, Nov, 18, 2006
Time: 10 am to 12 noon.
Site: Alameda First Baptist Church
      1515 Santa Clara Ave, Alameda 
Visitors welcome, open to the public. 

This will be our last Chapter meeting of 2006. Besides
holding our usual election / selection of Chapter
leadership for 2007, we also have a special
presentation by Chapter member Bob Cooley on new
efforts in the East Bay to introduce Electrathons.

Bob has been instrumental in getting a couple of local
High Schools started with this great hands-on
educational and sports activity. Electrathons have
been around for many years. It is a type electric
marathon race of High School age students, in which
the winner is determined by how far you go in a
certain time with a given amount of battery power. In
addition to creating races and competitions between
schools, each school creates a class for students to
be involved with the building, testing and refinement
of these vehicles.

Come see what an Electrathon is all about and how we
can support efforts to educating our students through
this medium.. Also other EVs will be on-hand and
informal Q&A can take place in the parking lot.

See you there.

http://www.ebeaa.org

*********END OF MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT***********




 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Want to start your own business?
Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
 
In a message dated 11/8/2006 11:32:42 PM Mountain Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Of  course I do expect the 'lectric bill to go up when I get
another EV back in  servive?



First full month of operating the trike, my bill went up $10 or so.   (7 
cents a KWH - municipally owner utility)  Plugged it in most nights,  covered 
about 400 miles the first month - all in town.  Part of that  increase could 
just 
be the "noise" of month to month changes - an extra day or  two in the meter 
reading cycle, the approach of Winter and so on.   

Matt  Parkhouse
Colorado Springs, CO
BMW m/c-Golf Cart trike - 48 volts, 30mph  on the flat, 35 mile range

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello John,

Reading the voltage at load and/or right at the load will not correspond to 
the Trojan battery open voltage and specific gravity chart, which I also use 
too.

Deep cycle batteries as being discharge, depleted the current first from the 
surface of the batteries grids, then more current comes to the surface deep 
from in the grids.

This is call the defusion of the acid deep inside  the plates to the 
electrolyte, which takes some time to do if the battery plates are very 
thick, is where the deep in cycle came from.

A battery with very thin plates, but more of, will discharge all of the 
surface charge charge all at once, so the defusion time if less and this 
type of battery normally has less ampere-hour but a high cranking ampere for 
a shorter period of time then of a deep cycle battery with thick plates.

It is normal for a battery that has a charge percentage of 80%, which is 
call State of Charge or SOC, which will read about 6.25 volts at no load, 
but may sag down to 6.01 volts which is 50% SOC, but the specific gravity 
will be about 1.238 sg which correspond to 6.25 at 80% SOC.

For long life, it is recommended to not discharge below 50% or to 6.01 at no 
load.  You can do discharge down to 20% one time for a test.  I did this one 
time after driving 40 miles on some grades that were 5 miles long and my EV 
started to slow down showing a sag voltage of about 5 volts.

So I turn around and drove down hill for about 5 miles.  This let the 
battery to do some defusing time and I make it all the way back home which I 
then had a open voltage of about 5.8 volts or was about 20% SOC after 15 
minutes of setting time.

Roland






----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: Battery standing voltage question


> Hi Roland,
>
> Its not an e-meter type device,  just a cheap battery fuel gauge.  It has 
> a
> couple of adjustment pots, but they are only 270 deg units and not well
> calibrated.  It is designed for a forklift to shut off a lift motor when 
> the
> battery reaches a minimum volts per cell.  I think it is set for 1.75 VPC
> from the factory or what is supposed to be 80% discharge.  I did not 
> connect
> the interlock as I am only using the unit as an indicator and I don't have 
> a
> lift to shut off.
>
> I think the meter is basically showing a minimum voltage so that if the 
> VPC
> drops to say 2.05 it moves to the left to that point and doesn't move back
> up until it is reset by a charge or power cycle.  Then on the next
> acceleration if the voltage goes down to say 1.98 then the meter moves a
> little farther to the left.  I think there is some damping in the
> electronics as I don't see the needle move on accel.  It just seems that 
> it
> is dropping faster than the standing voltages that I am reading.
>
> I think my question is about the "don't measure the voltage right after a
> discharge",  is that admonishment because the voltage reading would be
> incorrect to the low side?  I thought I understood that the voltage will
> rise to some extent after a discharge is stopped.
>
> I may just need to tube the "fuel gauge" and get a straight DC voltmeter 
> and
> learn the voltage limits.  I am not yet ready to go for the Link 10 or
> E-meter route as I hope to get to that level with the Tropica chassis for 
> my
> next conversion/restoration.
>
> respectfully,
> John Neiswanger
>
> http://www.indele.com/ANOTHER.htm
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Roland Wiench" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Battery standing voltage question
>
>
> > Hello John,
> >
> > There may be a Discharge Floor  (or minimum limit that you fuel gage or
> > E-meter may be set at).
> >
> > If the E-meter has a Discharge Floor of 100% meaning it displays the 
> > full
> > 100% range of the AH of the battery as for example for a 100 AH battery:
> >
> > Battery charge to 100% is 100% display or 0 AH used on the meter.
> >
> > Battery discharge to 50% is 50% display or 50 AH used or remaining on 
> > the
> > meter.
> >
> > If the Discharge Floor is set to 50% and the battery is at 100% charge, 
> > it
> > will also read 100% on the E-meter but when the battery is discharge to
> > 50%, this will read 0% on the meter.
> >
> > I have the same type of batteries you have, T-145's which are 260 AH. 
> > If
> > I set the AH and the Discharge Floor on a Link-10 E-meter to 100% and
> > discharge to 80% remaining, the E-meter shows about 52 AH use or 260 AH 
> > x
> > 20% = 52 AH
> >
> > If I set the E-meter to a Discharge Floor to 50%, then the E-meter
> > displays 26 AH use at 80%  or
> >
> > 260 x 50%= 130 AH, then:
> >
> > 130 AH x 20% = 26 AH use which is display as 80% on the E-meter.
> >
> > The 26 AH is actually 90% of the capacity of the battery but it displays
> > as 80% on the battery.
> >
> > I rather leave the Discharge Floor at 100% and never discharge below 50%
> > which would be about 130 AH left in the battery or if one battery reads
> > about 6.01 volts at no load what ever comes first.
> >
> > Roland
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:14 PM
> > Subject: Battery standing voltage question
> >
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I have been taking short runs with the electric bike and have come to a
> >> question about the standing voltage readings I am getting.
> >> Specs. Trojan T145 floodies
> >> running a 48 volt system, and charging in parallel 24 volt string.
> >> I have a Curtis "battery fuel gauge" which I think is actually just a
> >> minimum recording volt meter.
> >>
> >> After a 5 to 10 mile ride,  the "fuel gauge" reads anywhere from 1/3 to
> >> 3/4
> >> full.  But when I read the voltage with a DMM I read 80 to 95% charged
> >> based
> >> on a chart that I downloaded from Trojan's website.
> >>
> >> I understand that the instructions are to not measure the voltage just
> >> after
> >> a charge or a discharge.  I expected that to be because just after a
> >> charge
> >> the voltage would be overly high and that just after the discharge that
> >> it
> >> would be falsely low.
> >>
> >> My current draw is 80-125 amps as I cruise and can surge to 300+ on
> >> acceleration.  I expect that I am getting bit by Puekerts effect on the
> >> fuel
> >> gauge.  My basic question is does a heavy discharge cause an overly 
> >> high
> >> standing voltage reading?  I have taken the readings anywhere from 15
> >> minutes to the following day with similar results.
> >>
> >> respectfully,
> >> John Neiswanger
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
One way to reduce your electrical bill, is not to charge the batteries above 
90% or even 80% every time you charge it, unless you have to squeeze every 
bit of energy out of your batteries for your range.

If you have to deplete the batteries below 50% on every drive, than its best 
to have a higher AH battery for range and long life.

My battery cycles for a 260 AH battery is from 90 to 80% which takes out 
about 25 AH which takes only 30 to 35 minutes to charge to 90%.

About every three and sometimes every 6 months, I water, do a balance charge 
and then charge the batteries to 100%.

Trying to break my old record of 12 years on my last set of batteries, which 
were Exide X something of 235 AH.

Roland


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: Renewable Energy Idea, an' More!


>
> In a message dated 11/8/2006 11:32:42 PM Mountain Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Of  course I do expect the 'lectric bill to go up when I get
> another EV back in  servive?
>
>
>
> First full month of operating the trike, my bill went up $10 or so.   (7
> cents a KWH - municipally owner utility)  Plugged it in most nights, 
> covered
> about 400 miles the first month - all in town.  Part of that  increase 
> could just
> be the "noise" of month to month changes - an extra day or  two in the 
> meter
> reading cycle, the approach of Winter and so on.
>
> Matt  Parkhouse
> Colorado Springs, CO
> BMW m/c-Golf Cart trike - 48 volts, 30mph  on the flat, 35 mile range
>
> 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
HI-
First check the tach sensor by remeving the phone jack marked tack.
Sometimes the lead or the sensor it's self will be defective. This desables
the 
rev. limiter, so don't continue to run with it disconected after testing.
Check the air gap between the sensor and the black white marks on the shaft 
or pickup wheel, also be sure there is no intermittent light striking the
sensor
such as sun light or light reflecting off a moving part.
Next make sure the throttle sensor wire is not routed to close to the
hi-voltage
leads or the motor, it may need shielding.
Hope this helps.
F.T.

> [Original Message]
> From: Andrew A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: 11/8/2006 2:49:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Was motor roughness - Now Raptor Issue?
>
> Is there any chance that throttle ramping could affect
> this in any way? Since nobody else had brought it up
> yet, I figured I might as well.
>
> I'm a newbie who doesn't have a working EV (yet), so
> my suggestions shouldn't be taken too seriously.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Andrew
>
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > symptoms better described.
> > 1) If I start in 1st gear and give it some
> > acceleration, I get past the
> > roughness real quick.
> > If I try to creep real slow, the truck Oscillates
> > Lurch forward/slow down/
> > lurch forward/slow down. until I accelerate better.
> > Then it goes fine.
>
>
>
>  
>
____________________________________________________________________________
________
> Sponsored Link
>
> Get an Online or Campus degree
> Associate's, Bachelor's, or Master's - in less than one year.
> http://www.findtherightschool.com
>


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Yeah, I thought they have all those voltage classes so everyone with an electric car can be a World Record Holder. It isn't fair if someone is hogged them all.
How many cars compete in each class?
Jack

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just perusing the NEDRA sight and realized a current trend. A few vehicles are switching voltages up and down and gobbling up alot of the records. I understand in a free world to the victor goes the spoils but it makes me kinda sad. I always enjoyed checking out the record list of names from all different places, times, and configurations. Maybe it's just that I noticed my mother's 96 volt SC record got wiped recently. Are there any NEDRA limitations to how many voltage classes can be held by one vehicle? I have no doubt for instance that Dennis could take the CE dragster from top to bottom any day of the week he chooses, (Oops I forgot he's not a member), but you get my point. I have time slips to show the Orange Juice running WAY faster than some of the lower voltage records but since I had my sights on Ken and Jim's 240 volt number I never turned them in. Does anyone else feel this way or am I just too sentimental?

Shawn Lawless

PS: I guess it's out with the Zapi and lead, in with contactors and V28's, and down to Battery Beach with the Electropolitan to grab back that 96 volt record. Wanna go to Florida mom?
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
> It either works or it doesn't.  If it does I'll be first in line.  If not
> so
> what.  It doesn't bother me a bit.  I thought their challenge to the
> scientific world was fair.

Except their challenge is part of the scam.  Makes them look legitimate so
they can sucker in more investors while they spend YEARS decided which
scientists get to test it.

Check out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steorn

Everything they say about this project is vague, we were developing a
micro generator for /unamed company/ in partnership with /unamed dutch
company/, all of our results have been verified by /unamed individuals/
working for our company and our /unamed/ parner companies.
They haven't been filing their legally required paperwork for yers now so
you can't check that to find out what they are doing or who they are
working with.

The last time they filed they were over $300,000 in the hole with a cash
reserve of about $150.  FOr this project they claim they have raised some
$5 million.

I'll give them credit, it's difficult to debunk their device since they
have revealed practically nothing about it besides aknowleging that it
defies the laws of physics.

  Lawrence Rhodes....
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Danny Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 9:24 PM
> Subject: OT: Fox News falls for Steorn
>
>
>> Hey look, I guess everybody can use "magnetic free energy" to power
>> their EVs now.
>> Fox News' Neil Cavuto featured it, so it must be true!
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WV4Ja5Cjtvc
>>
>> I think the nation is a bit stupider for having watched this.
>>
>> Danny
>>
>
>


-- 
If you send email to me, or the EVDL, that has > 4 lines of legalistic
junk at the end; then you are specifically authorizing me to do whatever I
wish with the message.  By posting the message you agree that your long
legalistic signature is void.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hey guys, I'm trying to evaluate fets vs IGBTs for my motorcycle
controller. Can anyone suggest a good application reference for IGBTs?
MOSFET circuits are easy to dig up.

Will

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Did you say "Fox News"?

Danny Miller wrote:
Hey look, I guess everybody can use "magnetic free energy" to power their EVs now.
Fox News' Neil Cavuto featured it, so it must be true!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WV4Ja5Cjtvc

I think the nation is a bit stupider for having watched this.

Danny



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I think this (to be honest) motorcycle is a perfect bed for an ev drive
train of your choice.  At 120vdc it'd be a real great performer.  As they
have it now they have an K91 size motor that is fan cooled.  With just an
L91 and higher voltage this would be a very good hill climber.  It is pokey
slow now but with battey weight down low it has good potential.  If anyone
else has seen it and has ideas please feel free to comment.  As is it's an
ok city car but I think it should be geared down to 30mph.  Then it might
climb hills better.  A sepex system would work well in it.  I suspect you
could get gliders from China for much less than the 8k Zap would want for
them.  Lawrence Rhodes.......

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
What??
 Smaller pack LARGER charger!!

Madman
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lawrence Rhodes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 1:34 AM
Subject: Re: Phoenix Motorcars Takes SEMA Show by Storm


> The other advantage of quick charging is a smaller charger & pack.  You
will
> save on battery cost.  Lawrence Rhodes.......
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 5:16 PM
> Subject: Re: Phoenix Motorcars Takes SEMA Show by Storm
>
>
> > The PDF data sheet indicates 10 minutes to 90%.
> >
> > http://www.altairnano.com/documents/060926HOUSECARBZEV.pdf
> >
> > Ken
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 11/8/2006 5:56:06 PM Central Standard Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Good point.
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 2:52 pm, Paschke, Stephen wrote:
> > > We heard about this on this list in a press release a few months ago.
> > > There was a lot of "I'll believe it when I see it."
> > > I still say prove it.  I'm sure that is not a full charge.  Maybe 80%
> > > or
> > > the top 5%?
> > > Remember they said "as little as".
> > >
> > >>  Stephen Paschke
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
According to norwegian newspaper today, new documents
tells that Ford Motor Company sold Think Nordic to the
indian businessman Kamal Siddiqi's company Kamkorp in
January 2003 for one USD.
Ford bought  Think Nordic in 1999 for 25 million USD,
and invested over 150 million USD in to the new
electric vehicle consept was almost finished.
Ford also put over 20 million USD into the company to
ensure that Kamkorp sould at least run it for 18
months. These numbers has been known from the
bankrupcy investigation 
"We paid this to ensure that the production of
electric vehicles in Aurskog, Norway should continue"
says Ford's vice-executive in Europe, mr. Ingvar M.
Sviggum.
He will not comment that there was other willing to
pay a lot more for the company.

The old founders of Th!nk is now back again after Mr.
Kamal Siddiqi's bankrupcy with the company Th!nk
Technology. Their aim is to produce 5000 cars in 2008.

Arne Magnus Berge
Norway

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
In a message dated 11/9/2006 8:22:03 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 
> : Multiple NEDRA records 
> Date:11/9/2006 8:22:03 AM Pacific Standard Time
> From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-to:[email protected]
> To:[email protected]
> Received from Internet: 
> 
> 
> 
> Yeah, I thought they have all those voltage classes so everyone with an 
> electric car can be a World Record Holder.  It isn't fair if someone is 
> hogged them all.
> How many cars compete in each class?
> Jack
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I was just perusing the NEDRA sight and realized a current trend.  A few 
> >vehicles are switching voltages up and down and gobbling up alot of the 
> >records.  I understand in a free world to the victor goes the spoils but 
> >it makes me kinda sad. I always enjoyed checking out the record list of 
> >names from all different places, times, and configurations.  Maybe it's 
> >just that I noticed my mother's 96 volt SC record got wiped recently.  
> >Are there any NEDRA limitations to how many voltage classes can be held 
> >by one vehicle?  I have no doubt for instance that Dennis could take the 
> >CE dragster from top to bottom any day of the week he chooses, (Oops I 
> >forgot he's not a member), but you get my point.  I have time slips to 
> >show the Orange Juice running WAY faster than some of the lower voltage 
> >records but since I had my sights on Ken and Jim's 240 volt number I 
> >never turned them in.  Does anyone else feel this way or am I just too 
> >sentimental?
> >
> >Shawn Lawless
> >
> >PS: I guess it's out with the Zapi and lead, in with contactors and 
> >V28's, and down to Battery Beach with the Electropolitan to grab back 
> >that 96 volt record. Wanna go to Florida mom?
> >_______________________________________________
Well since my name is in this post I will reply.Shawn is correct in posting 
the CE dragster could take all the voltage class records(if I were to become a 
nedra member again)But you will not see me doing this,I do not think it fair 
to upcoming competitors.                                                        
                                                                I am also 
building a S10 pu to race in the SC class between 240 to 348 volts.I plan on 
using this pu as a daily ev driver.To race in the SC class however one canot 
have 
a rear end other than the stock housing.I did not read all the rules however 
before I built the S10,so I did put in a 9in.ford already.So I assume (if I 
join nedra again in the future)that I will be in the pro street class.After 
reading about the current SC class record holders its come to my attention that 
they may indeed also have 9in ford rears.So my question to nedra can the rules 
be 
bent?And how much?                          Dennis Berube

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hear hear HEAR!

I do support your idea.

In fact that is one of the reasons why NEDRA made sure you can only register
for one voltage class a day.
Well that was the point...
And They should stick with it.

Rich Rudman
Manzanita Micro

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 3:26 AM
Subject: Multiple NEDRA records


> I was just perusing the NEDRA sight and realized a current trend.  A
> few vehicles are switching voltages up and down and gobbling up alot of
> the records.  I understand in a free world to the victor goes the
> spoils but it makes me kinda sad. I always enjoyed checking out the
> record list of names from all different places, times, and
> configurations.  Maybe it's just that I noticed my mother's 96 volt SC
> record got wiped recently.  Are there any NEDRA limitations to how many
> voltage classes can be held by one vehicle?  I have no doubt for
> instance that Dennis could take the CE dragster from top to bottom any
> day of the week he chooses, (Oops I forgot he's not a member), but you
> get my point.  I have time slips to show the Orange Juice running WAY
> faster than some of the lower voltage records but since I had my sights
> on Ken and Jim's 240 volt number I never turned them in.  Does anyone
> else feel this way or am I just too sentimental?
>
> Shawn Lawless
>
> PS: I guess it's out with the Zapi and lead, in with contactors and
> V28's, and down to Battery Beach with the Electropolitan to grab back
> that 96 volt record. Wanna go to Florida mom?
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Check out the new AOL.  Most comprehensive set of free safety and
> security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from
> across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
>

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to