I think this is the spec sheet for the cells used:
http://www.s399157097.onlinehome.us/SpecSheets/LVP10-65.pdf

The specific energy is less than LiFePO4, so they were not very bright in choosing these. They could have picked LiFePO4, avoided the fires, and kept the battery boxes the same size.

The specs on the GS batteries:
http://www.s399157097.onlinehome.us/SpecSheets/LVP10-65.pdf

I was looking at the photos of the remains for the battery boxes. There is no thermal management. I also saw no internal disconnect, but I could be mistaken.

The metal oxide (cobalt, for example) release the oxygen once they reach a critical internal temperature. Since they have flammable electrolyte, they have everything they need internally to burn. Like a rocket. I

LiFePO4 don't have available internal oxygen. They release flammable electrolyte, and that is it. If you exclude oxygen, they don't burn. Big difference. If LiFePO4 do catch fire, they burn more like a couch, not a rocket.

It is not due to simply the energy contained, it is a whole different kind for fire. You simply cannot put out a metal oxide cell, once it has ignited.

Bill D.


All types of lithium batteries burn. The LiCo cells, because of their higher voltage and higher stored energy, burn worse than LiFe cells. But it's like comparing a box of matches to a box of kindling. Once lit, they both burn dramatically.

_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to