Heavy highway trucks last over a million miles and the recent  advances
made in producing diesel fuel from algae, NOT Foodstock like corn, are
 very encouraging for the over-the-road trucks and freight trains...

*Dennis Lee Miles *






On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Peri Hartman via EV <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Yep, biofuels are a better short term solution.  The technology to use and
> distribute them exists.  The production is improving and, I believe, will
> be done much more efficiently than current (and using food crops is a
> disaster).
>
> Hydrogen can have its niches but I just don't see it being practical to
> carry around small bombs everywhere nor does it make sense to try to
> "overrule" physics.
>
> In the mean time, on with the development of better batteries or
> capacitors!  Or ideas not yet thought of.
>
> Peri
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "Martin WINLOW via EV" <[email protected]>
> To: "Robert Bruninga" <[email protected]>; "Electric Vehicle Discussion
> List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: 27-Jun-14 1:51:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] Hydrogen/EV thoughts (relax)
>
>  "But in the long run, when all the oil is gone, we will still need the
>> density of chemical fuel for the long-haul interstate travel. And
>> Hydrogen is one technology worth looking at." I disagree. The only reason
>> we could not power all our transportation needs from electricity is when
>> you are operating somewhere that has none and it is not practical to
>> provide it - ie in the middle of no-where and on a short timescale (ie no
>> time to install PV or whatever). For that, bio-fuels would work perfectly
>> well and you could use ordinary ICE vehicles with it so no need to spend
>> (yet more) countless billions developing FCVs and their equally insanely
>> expensive infrastructure.
>>
>> I'm sure you are saying "What about those long distance trucks?". Well,
>> aside from the obvious fact that most of this sort of transport should be
>> on trains (preferably electric ones) there is no technical reason why
>> trucks couldn't be EVs too and definitely not so if major highways were
>> equipped with inductive power transfer technology. This is simple to
>> install and compared to what they are talking about spending on an H2
>> refuelling infrastructure, cheap as chips (fries)!
>>
>> MW
>>
>>
>> On 26 Jun 2014, at 15:32, Robert Bruninga via EV wrote:
>>
>>   Folks,
>>>
>>>  EV's and Hydorgen fuel cell cars are NOT in competition. (except in
>>>  Toyota's fantasy dreams).. There is no need to get worked up.
>>>
>>>  EV's are far, far better for local travel and daily commuting (80% of
>>> our
>>>  miles). But in the long run, when all the oil is gone, we will still
>>> need
>>>  the density of chemical fuel for the long-haul interstate travel. And
>>>  Hydrogen is one technology worth looking at.
>>>
>>>  As everyone points out, Hydrogen makes no sense compared to an EV in
>>> *all*
>>>  aspects for what EV's do best. But we need to continue to explore it for
>>>  when HYDROGEN might become a byproduct of daily peak grid excess
>>> renewable
>>>  energy capture (no matter how inefficient).
>>>
>>>  EVs and FCV's are completely different applications. And only the media
>>>  and others who think anything with 4 wheels and a GO pedal should do
>>>  everything-for-everyone sees them as both very limited and the same...
>>>
>>>  Bob
>>>
>>>  -----Original Message-----
>>>  From: EV [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martin WINLOW
>>> via
>>>  EV
>>>  Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 5:25 AM
>>>  To: Mark Abramowitz; Electric Vehicle Discussion List
>>>  Subject: Re: [EVDL] Hydrogen/EV thoughts
>>>
>>>  Mark,
>>>
>>>  Please stop wittering on and actually address some of the points the
>>> anti
>>>  H2 FCV commentators have made here.
>>>
>>>  Principally, please explain how you believe H2 FCVs will work in terms
>>> of
>>>  efficiency Vs (real ie plug-in) EVs?
>>>
>>>  MW
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>> For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/
>> group/NEDRA)
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/
> group/NEDRA)
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20140627/a04764df/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to