It would billed by kWh (amount of energy delivered). There would likely be an 
increased cost for fast charging (higher power charging = more kW) because fast 
charging may be more convenient in some situations. But ultimately the final 
cost would depend on amount delivered. 

Tom Keenan

> On Sep 14, 2016, at 7:47 AM, Mark Abramowitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Why kWh, and not kW?
> 
> Sent from AltaMail
> 
> 
>> 
>> From:        Tom Keenan via EV <[email protected]>
>> To:  paul dove <[email protected]>,       Electric Vehicle Discussion 
>> List <[email protected]>
>> CC:  Lawrence Rhodes <[email protected]>
>> Subject:     Re: [EVDL] EVLN: Na Researchers reveal 650mi on single-charge 
>> Tesla     'superbatteries'
>> Date:        9/14/16, 7:08 AM
>> 
>> 
>> Perhaps the next thing in charging will be to post a sign at the charge 
>> station with a $/kWh sign - somewhat like $/gallon at gas stations. Could be 
>> different prices for L2 and fast charging. Once there are enough charging 
>> stations in an area, drivers could choose based on price they see, rather 
>> than poking around a smartphone app and trying to decipher the various 
>> charges online. Might make the cost of charging more competitive and less 
>> random. 
>> 
>> Tom Keenan 
>> 
>> > On Sep 14, 2016, at 3:50 AM, paul dove via EV <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> > 
>> > Hey Lawrence, 
>> > 
>> > Yeah I don't believe that is true. Their may be some game by reducing 
>> > weight I don't think aerodynamics is going to play into it unless it's a 
>> > sports car. Most people purchase a car 
>> > For other reasons then economy. Comfort, utility, whatever fits their 
>> > lifestyle. Weight is the greatest factor in the range of your vehicle. I 
>> > have two electric vehicles and they both follow the rule of thumb 
>> > weight/10 = watts per mile. This changes based on how you drive but that's 
>> > the average again. I believe battery technology will continue to improve 
>> > for another 10 years. I think the bigger problem is the charging 
>> > infrastructure. The cars are good enough now and the batteries are good 
>> > enough now there's just a shortage of places to charge. They shouldn't 
>> > start charging stations at every gas station preferably fast chargers.they 
>> > need to quit giving away free energy and start charging for the 
>> > electricity so that the stations are reliable and maintained by someone 
>> > making a profit. Then there would be no obstacle as to where you could 
>> > drive your car and that's coming I'm sure of that. 
>> > Sent from my iPhone 
>> > 
>> >> On Sep 12, 2016, at 10:10 PM, Lawrence Rhodes via EV <[email protected]> 
>> >> wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >> Clearly the next frontier in electric automobile design is not the 
>> >> battery but the efficiency of the vehicle. If it is lighter and more 
>> >> aerodynamic this will allow the use of smaller packs and longer range. 
>> >> With smaller packs the charging time is reduced taking away the #1 
>> >> problem with electric cars. The charging time. Currently Solar Cars from 
>> >> the Tesla Crusier Class at the World Solar challenge with out solar 
>> >> assistance have a 400 mile range on 15kw of batteries. Of course the 
>> >> vehicles weigh under 1000 pounds have seating for four and the tires are 
>> >> very narrow. I've been in Stella. It is comfortable and practical. The 
>> >> next electric vehicle I build will be light and efficient. 
>> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20160914/77e4b52c/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to