*Some* L2 would still be desirable. 
It can help when there are not enough L1/outlets.
But sometimes you want to make an unplanned trip and an hour or two of L2 on 
site can make the difference. 
-- 
-Chris

On November 6, 2016 7:35:41 AM CST, Robert Bruninga via EV <[email protected]> 
wrote:
>> Sorry Robert, I completely disagree with you.
>> most people ultimately won't care if they are driving an ICE or an
>EV,
>> they bought the car for transportation and that's it.
>> If they need to go to a quick charge station once a week,
>> that's status quo for them. No big deal.
>
>I think many people are smarter than that.  Once people with a daily 20
>or
>30 mile commute realize that they are spending an extra $15,000 for a
>200
>mile battery that they never use, when a $5,000 can do the same job we
>will
>start to see the practicality come back in to the car purchasing
>decision.
>
>> there are plenty of people who will never have a fixed location to
>charge.
>
>And so they will likely continue to need an ICE.  But if the other 80%
>of
>us switch to electric look what a boon to emissions reduction that will
>be.  And those tht can afford to buy a 200 mile EV will.  But they
>should
>be aware that there will never be enough fast chargers and they will
>waste
>a good portion of their lives trying to find a place to charge and then
>have to waste a half hour waiting for it to work.
>
>Most people are smarter than that.
>
>> At some point, the cost of building very high speed level 3 charge
>stations
>> will be cheaper than providing L2 charging in parking places.
>
>There is lunacy in that vision as well.  It makes no sense to put L2
>chargers in workplace, airport, trainstation parking spaces.  Or any
>place
>where cars spend 8 hours a day parked.  The L2 is a complete waste
>there,
>when a standard 120v oulet can do the same job.  In 8 hours, an L1
>ouitlet
>(or cord) can provide 40 miles of range.  More than the daily usage of
>the
>average american.
>
>And cars spend 23 hours a day parked somewhere.
>
>Bob
>
>> ------ Original Message ------
>> From: "Robert Bruninga via EV" <[email protected]>
>> To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <[email protected]>
>> Cc:
>> Sent: 05-Nov-16 9:20:07 AM
>> Subject: Re: [EVDL] Local dealer $1k-deposit-signup(reserve): Bolt
>EV's In
>> Production
>>
>> Seriously?
>>>
>>>  if you don't have access to an EVSE, you can't charge your Bolt.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It is foolish for anyone to buy an EV if he does not have a parking
>place
>>> and a place to charge it everyday. (At home or at work).  Fast
>charging is
>>> only for emergencies and trips.  It is UNSUSTAINABLE to think that
>EV's
>>> are
>>> going to be fueled using the old gas-station model (which is the
>ultimate
>>> in inconveneince that the EV (charged while parked at home or at
>work)  is
>>> best at eliminating!)....
>>>
>>> Bob, WB4APR
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 8:02 AM, paul dove via EV <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Because the government forced them to make it
>>>>
>>>>  Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>  > On Nov 4, 2016, at 10:00 PM, Rush Dougherty via EV
><[email protected]
>>>> >
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>  >
>>>>  > I looked at the Bolt last night on line, spent a little while
>going
>>>> thru
>>>>  the
>>>>  > stats, various reviews etc.
>>>>  >
>>>>  > One thing that totally astounded me was that the CSS Inlet and
>HV
>>>>  charging set
>>>>  > up costs about $500 and ALSO the Level 1 charger costs another
>$500 or
>>>>  so. That
>>>>  > means that if you don't have access to an EVSE, you can't charge
>your
>>>>  Bolt.
>>>>  >
>>>>  > Come on now folks, is this company really serious about entering
>into
>>>>  the EV
>>>>  > market? Why produce an EV it you won't even supply a way to
>charge
>>>> it...
>>>>  >
>>>>  > My 2 watts opinion...
>>>>  >
>>>>  > Rush Dougherty
>>>>  > Tucson AZ 85719
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>>  > _______________________________________________
>>>>  > UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>>>>  > http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>>>>  > Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
>>>>  > Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/
>>>>  group/NEDRA)
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>  UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>>>>  http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>>>>  Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
>>>>  Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/
>>>>  group/NEDRA)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: <http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/
>>> 20161105/6ab3bb6b/attachment.htm>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>>> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>>> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
>>> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA
>(http://groups.yahoo.com/group
>>> /NEDRA)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
><http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20161106/7ca6742b/attachment.htm>
>_______________________________________________
>UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
>Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA
>(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to