Michael Ross via EV wrote:
Yeah, I wouldn't say prove either. But testing can be far better than the
old tried, and not very good cycling tests.
It all depends on who is doing the testing, and why.
If it's being done by marketing to promote sales, they're likely to pick
a test procedure that gives the best results possible. Often, they won't
specify the test procedure used, or leave out crucial information.
If it's done by a customer, to evaluate how long it's likely to last in
their product, they are more likely to strive for meaningful test results.
If it's done by an independent researcher, look at who's paying for the
testing.
--
Imagination is your preview of life's coming attractions.
(Albert Einstein)
--
Lee Hart, 814 8th Ave N, Sartell MN 56377, www.sunrise-ev.com
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
