Saibal wrote:
>I must have misunderstood the concept of ``doppelbrothersisters��. I meant >that identical copies should be identified. I have nothing against that identification, but I guess you agree we should stop the identification when the neighborhoods differs so that the copies begin to diverge. I mean identical copies embedded in identical comp histories can perhaps be identified. We need some prudence because a literal identification could alter the "correct" relative probabilities. Bruno
