Hi George, I hope my last post was not to rude. You see, now's my turn to feel guilty.
Also I was not completely honest ... I guess I'm afraid that (re)abording the technical part of my thesis could interfere with the writting of the paper I told Russell about. I'm very nervous with that writting. Yet I am going through, and the more it advances the more easy it will be for me handle the interference ... Explaining the UDA on the list is easy compared with saying a little more that generality on G and G*. You know G is for Godel, and I have not yet solved the problem of how to begin an explanation on Godel by mail on the list. (I hesitate between three different and conflicting ways to do that). I have also found that that everything-silence was a little weird. I think that it is unique in the story of the list. At some moment I have interpreted that like if people were beginning to be overbored by my approach. This happens to me too, sometimes! I guess that's normal, nothing to worry about. Just gives me some days before I decide how to proceed. In any case I appreciate very much your interest, and I will try to do my best. Sincerely, Bruno