On 5 xxx -1, Marchal wrote: > Scott D. Yelich wrote: > >Knowledge is when predicted. > > If something can be predicted, then that "something" is "knowledge" > I agree with the second sentence, but I am still uneased with the first. > Do we know our past ? Is there a sense in saying we predict our past ? > Bruno
I don't want to debate the direction of the arrow of time. I am simply saying that through experience we change what we "know" ... and that I am working with two methods of doing so. One is a low-level "biological" method, the other is a higher-level symbolic/logical method. The higher level depends on the lower level, or rather, is a direct dependent of it. Scott
