> but my view is that consciousness
> does'nt need descretization to function. 

Yes, I think we agree here.  But I must admit, I am at a loss as to imagine what 
non-discrete might be.  

> It's more likely that a more fluid view 
> of the universe is the accurate model.


If we cannot formally implement "fluid" or "continuum", then these will forever be out 
of our reach.  We might as well give up.

We may have *descriptions* of the continuum.  But they are just descriptions... and 
remain, finite.

I stand by my original claim:

Any successful human Theory of Everything must recognize the discrete nature of the 
human intellect, and our inability to express or engage the continuum in any 
meaningful way.


Reply via email to