One more thing. At 22:19 -0700 8/07/2002, Wei Dai wrote: >First I question the necessity of defining that average.
Do you agree that in QM (and in any TOE QM-based), there *is* an average. Do you agree that QM is a sort of (non commutative) *measure* theory? Do you accept QM? Are you following Schmidhuber in its critics of QM ? Schmidhuber does not appreciate the comp indeterminacy and its relevance, but he does not believe (cf his second toe paper) in the QM indeterminacy too! I'm quite at ease with QM, both the many-world feature and its interference of probability amplitude fit well with the comp indeterminacy on UD* (Universal Dovetailer trace) Of course I didn't expect the QM wave like feature and the exploitability of those wave interferences, but I gave reasons to expect them from the Z logics. How far follow you Schmidhuber? Bruno