|
I have been trying to comprehend the UD-Argument of
Brunos, following the links supplied at http://www.escribe.com/science/theory/m3044.html,
and I find myself accepting step 1 to 10, but not some of the conclusions. ANY
virtual reconstitution and computational stories going thrue it necesseraly has
a real (physical) interpretation. So when Bruno casts away the hardware and says
that all is software this doesn�t follow with any necessity. So what is question
11, Bruno?
Lennart
|
Title: Re: being inside a universe
- Re: being inside a universe Bruno Marchal
- Re: being inside a universe Wei Dai
- Re: being inside a universe Bruno Marchal
- Re: being inside a universe Wei Dai
- Re: being inside a universe Bruno Marchal
- Causality Tim May
- Re: being inside a universe Wei Dai
- Re: being inside a universe Stephen Paul King
- Re: being inside a universe Bruno Marchal
- Re: being inside a universe Bruno Marchal
- Re: real and virtual Lennart Nilsson
- Re: real and virtual Bruno Marchal
- realism vs. Church-Turing Thes... Wei Dai
- Re: conservation laws Jacques Mallah
- Re: being inside a universe Bruno Marchal
- Re: being inside a universe Hal Finney
- Re: being inside a universe Brent Meeker
- Re: being inside a universe Hal Finney
- Logical depth Tim May
- Re: being inside a universe Wei Dai
- Re: being inside a universe Wei Dai

