Thank you, Saibal Mitra.
If I may add one remark to your position: to
">They are mere mathematical tools to compute the
>outcome of experiments.<
I would add: and the presupposition of such contributed
to the design of those experiments with a presupposition
of "acceptable" vs "rejectable" results.

John Mikes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"http://pages.prodigy.net/jamikes";


----- Original Message -----
From: "Saibal Mitra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bruno Marchal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "scerir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "FoR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 8:11 AM
Subject: Copenhagen interpretation


> This all assumes that photons, electrons, etc. are real. We don't know
that.
> If you were Einstein, and you were faced with Bell's result, you could
have
> concluded that the nonexistence of local hidden variables implies that
> elementary paricles don't exist. They are mere mathematical tools to
compute
> the outcome of experiments. The real underlying theory of Nature could be
> still be deterministic. Recently 't Hooft has shown how QM can emerge out
of
> a deterministic theory. In this case QM has to be interpreted according to
> the Copenhagen interpretation.
>
>
> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
> Van: "Bruno Marchal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Aan: "scerir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Verzonden: vrijdag 12 juli 2002 12:44
> Onderwerp: Re: "Morality" in a Block Multiverse
>
>
> > Hi Serafino,
> >
SNIP

Reply via email to