George Levy wrote: >Bruno Marchal wrote: > >>George Levy asks recently "Could somebody incorporate >>complementarity in a thought experiment in the style of Bruno's >>duplication experiment?" >> >>This is an interesting proposal and I would be glad if someone manage >>to present one. Just that it is *because* duplication-like experiment leads >>quickly to obscurities and misleading intuitions, *that* modal logic >>appears to be a fruitful investment, even if it is not the only one. >> > >GL: As it stand, the comp hypothesis is only a philosophical >exercise because it does not reproduce the same phenomenon as QM in >particular the phenomenon of complementarity.
BM: Do you mean "it does not reproduce the same phenomenon as QM", or do you mean that we have not yet understood how it could reproduce the same phenomenon as QM"? I will not bore you with technics buts complementarity can be handled in Z1* (extract from comp) although there are still open problems. Anyway, thank you for the thought experiment I will read it at ease. Bruno
