> See my web page for links to papers, and archive addresses with > more explanations, including the basic results of my thesis. > (Mainly the Universal Dovetailer Argument UDA and its Arithmetical > version AUDA).
I read your argument for the UDA, and there's nothing there that particularly worries me. You seem to be making points about the limitations of the folk-psychology notion of identity, rather than about the actual nature of the universe... > >When you say "sum over all computational histories", what if we > just fix a > >bound N, and then say "sum over all computational histories of > algorithmic > >info. content <= N." Finite-information-content-universe, no Godel > >problems. So what's the issue? > > The main reason is that, once we postulate that we are turing emulable, > (i.e. the computationalist hypothesis comp), then there is a form > of indeterminacy which occurs and which force us to take into account the > incompleteness phenomenon. ?? I'm sorry, but I don't get it. Could you please elaborate? thanks Ben
