Le 26-avr.-05, à 21:36, John M a écrit :
Ah John, if only I could understand what you're saying...
Sorry, Russell, I fell back into my "wholitic" lingo with several
are not identical to the 'general usage'.
I wish you could point out 'some' which I should try to elaborate on.
Maybe we could do this in private exchange, to be nice to the list.
That would not be nice to the list, imo. I'm sure people
on the list can trash by themselves the threads
in which they are not interested. We have good
training with the spam. But also, I think we can progress
only by understanding misunderstandings ...
In particular I intend to make somme comments
on a post by John asap, and so I would prefer
the thread stays online. This is Wei Dai non-moderate
list, and I know "non-moderation" makes people tending
to moderate themselves a little bit too much ... :)
The reason I'm interested in the John/Russell debate is
that I suspect Russell can swallow my methodology but not
yet entirely the conclusions; and I suspect John can swallow
my conclusions, but not really the methodology. So I could
(selfishly) be helped in communicating my work by finding
a sort of mean between Russell and John.
I will elaborate later.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Russell Standish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Stathis Papaioannou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <email@example.com>
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: "Free Will Theorem"