Le 30-juil.-05, à 17:18, Aditya Varun Chadha a écrit :
I think Mazer has put this across quite nicely, so I pause here.
I agree with you and Jesse Mazer. Except that Jesse points on a
"speculation on the observer-moments", where I find enough to speculate
on the truth on the comp hypothesis which is implicitly or explicitly a
common hypothesis in both physics and cognitive science.
Since there is nothing specifically human about my idea of
"observer-moments" this analogy doesn't really work.
Jesse
I agree more with this version of "observer-moments". An assumption
that an "observer" is a human or even a "biological" entity is being
narrow-minded IMO.
OK. Many people tend to forget that rather key point.
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
