I want to make it clear that in my sentence and re the details of my post that in my corrected sentence:

"Universes do not arise out of nothing but rather out of the mere possibility of Nothing and All."

the "... mere possibility of Nothing and All." is a simultaneous possibility since as I point out in my post the Nothing and my All are the two resulting sub lists of a single division of the full list of all possible features of objects and ideas. For reasons that I have pointed to in other posts these from one list to two sub lists divisions of the full list are just what are called definitions.

The result is that it is not nothing or something or other such exclusive or's but rather both Nothing and All simultaneously. This is what makes the "reality" of Nothing and All unavoidable.


Reply via email to