Re: Let There Be Something

[Hal Ruhl]

I want to make it clear that in my sentence and re the details of my 
post that in my corrected sentence:

"Universes do not arise out of nothing but rather out of the mere 
possibility of Nothing and All."

the "... mere possibility of Nothing and All." is a simultaneous 
possibility since as I point out in my post the Nothing and my All 
are the two resulting sub lists of a single division of the full list 
of all possible features of objects and ideas.  For reasons that I 
have pointed to in other posts these from one list to two sub lists 
divisions of the full list are just what are called definitions.

The result is that it is not nothing or something or other such 
exclusive or's but rather both Nothing and All simultaneously.  This 
is what makes the "reality" of Nothing and All unavoidable.

Hal