Hal Ruhl
Unfortunately lately I do not have the time to read and think through
each post but I would like to briefly point out that my approach has
the Godelian ingredients of completeness/incompleteness,
consistency/inconsistency and self reference. The power set of
divisions of the list provides [I think] an uncountable infinity of
universes of any given category. The self reference infinitely nests
the system. I suppose that one could think of this last as either
infinite regression or a system that eats its own tail [a termination
of a causal chain. So as in the case of my Nothing and my All it
seems the apex of causation may be neither infinite regression "or"
termination but rather both [an "and"].
- Re: Let There Be Something Hal Ruhl
- Re: Let There Be Something Stephen Paul King
- Re: Let There Be Something Daddycaylor
- Re: Let There Be Something Hal Ruhl
- Re: Let There Be Something Hal Ruhl
- Re: Let There Be Something daddycaylor
- Re: Let There Be Something Hal Ruhl
- Re: Let There Be Something "Hal Finney"
- Re: Let There Be Something daddycaylor
- Re: Let There Be Something daddycaylor
- Re: Let There Be Something Quentin Anciaux