Bruno Marchal wrote: > > Le 01-juil.-06, à 19:54, Brent Meeker a écrit : > > >>Sure it is. Just because something cannot be directly experienced >>doesn't rule it out of a >>scienctific model: quarks can't be observed, but their effects can. > > > > OK, but we were discussing about theories. general relativity, as a > theory does not assume the existence of readers of "relativity > journal". The quantum theory *with collapse* is already less clear on > that ... > > > >>So I believe in other people's >>first person experience because that is a good way to predict their >>behavoir. > > > Except the same theory would predict the behavior of zombie. We are > arguing on a fundamental level. All what I argue for is that once you > *assume* comp, then there is no aristotelian primary matter, and > eventually physics is branch of number's bio/psych/theo/logy.
As I understand it, assuming comp is assuming that there are no zombies. Brent Meeker --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
