|
Norman,
my response to the subject is: NO. I
learned a good _expression_ here (on this list) I think from Tom(?): "perception
of reality".
" I can only assume that reality is how things appear to me
- and I might be wrong." (Wise way to save one's sanity.)
Upon (cultural?) historical examples I have to
conclude that our knowledge
(unspecified, - all of it) is limited and
increasing over time, so the 'reality' we think of is changing to include more
and more details.
We experience within our ever existing
knowledge-base (ncluding now) by interpretation of the impacts we get into the
now-content controlled variants.
Provided that we believe that there IS a reality
- the source of those impacts unknown - I would not call my present-level
partial interpretation as the (unknown) total.
John M
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
- Re: Can we ever know truth? jamikes
- RE: Can we ever know truth? - simulation Nick Prince
- RE: Can we ever know truth? Stathis Papaioannou
- RE: Can we ever know truth? John M
- Re: Can we ever know truth? Brent Meeker
- Re: Can we ever know truth? Rich Winkel
- Re: Can we ever know truth? Bruno Marchal
- RE: Can we ever know truth? Stathis Papaioannou

