[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > !Z: > Is "matter" a property vs "not matter"?
what would it be a property *of* ? > later you substituted 'matter' with 'substrate' when you drew the identity > as being "interchangeable" to. So is radiation "matterly matter" or an > interchange? I told you I am nitpicking. The traditional matter/energy distinction maps onto the fermion/boson disinction. > I am not accepting the identification of existence as "exist" must be. I don't see what you mean by that. > Then > you bring in "things" and "concepts", hard to follow, when you deny the > existence of HP things "literally" existing ONLY in the mind. You don't *literally* have wizards and dragons in your mind. > You missed a reply about the numbers. > > Destroying 'matter'? one mysterious way is to let it be absorbed in a BH, Conservation laws are still obeyed. > the other - with your words - to 'interchange' (I still did not get whether > radiation IS matter or only "interchangeable" into). It is a form of the substrate. > I wanted to illustrate that the "words" we use are captured by different > persons in different meanings/connotations. > Once it comes to non-conventional thoughts, we do not have the words. > > I hope I did not irritate you. I tried hard to be difficult. > > John M > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "1Z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Everything List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 3:33 PM > Subject: Re: Difficulties in communication. . . > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
