On 12/26/2025 3:20 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Dec 25, 2025 at 4:04 PM Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote

    />>>>> The difference is that human specialization emerges from a
    single, unified system/


    *>>>>If that was true then Einstein could've used language to
    explain exactly how he got such wonderfully good ideas*


    />>>How do you know he couldn't? /


    *>> I know that because I have read some of the stuff he has
    written but I'm still not as smart as Einstein.*


    /> I've read stuff he wrote too, but I don't recall him
    explaining how he got good ideas except in few instances.  I doubt
    you even know how you get good ideas.  It seems to me they just
    come into my mind as a think of a problem./


*Yes exactly!Einstein never used language to explain how he got his wonderful ideas because he couldn't and he couldn't because language was not how we got those ideas in the first place. So there must have been more to Einstein's mind than just the ability to use language. So his mind was not "/a single unified system/" as you claimed. *
First, I didn't claim that.  You're mixing my posts with those of my son, Barrett.**And in any case "a single unified system" doesn't necessarily imply that everything in the system is explicable in language.For example a computer translator from English to German is a single unified system...but it can't explain what it's circuitry is.  A system may be unified only in terms of having the same ends.*

*
*So there's no reason to expect or to demand that an AI be a large language model and nothing else. *
*
*

    /> Have you read the book that describes Einstein's patented
    ideas.  He patented quite a few inventions and in some cases, with
    the help of an engineering partner, tried to make them into
    products.  For example he patented an airfoil.  The only one that
    worked was a gas refrigerator.  Even geniuses don't always have
    good ideas./


*Einstein had nearly 50 patents,believe it or not he even got a patent for a new type of elastic vest, it looked like this: *

8EBF4576-5257-4FC6-B629-890F7FAC89BC.jpeg
*As you mentioned Einstein is better known forinventing two different types of refrigerators, both of them worked but neither of them were very practical. Einstein is even better known for doing some other stuff. *
*
*
*That Time Albert Einstein Decided to Try to Revolutionize Keeping Food Cold <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrRVDpLJgGQ>
*
*
*
*John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>*
mzc
*
*
**










            *>> And a great human grandmasterhas developed a
            specialized chess program in his head, that's why he may
            be able to beat any human being on the planet at the game
            of chess but he's not especially good at anything else.
            There is however one big difference between the human and
            the computer, the human developed his skill after years
            of watching other grandmasters and reading books about
            chess, but the computer program AlphaZero needed no help
            from anything except simple instructions that told it (or
            him or her)  which moves were legal and which were
            illegal. And just 24 hours later, after playing millions
            of games of chess against itself, AlphaZero was able to
            beatthat human chess grandmaster. *


        /> But would that work at Poker?/


    *Yes. No-limit Texas Hold'em is the most popular form of poker
    and it's played in the World Series of Poker, and in 2017 the AI
    program "Libratus" defeated the best human poker players in the
    world. It got so good at the game by using something called
    Counterfactual Regret Minimization. It played trillions of hands
    of poker against copies of itself and after each hand it in
    effect looks back and asks "what if I had played differently?"
    For every decision pointit calculates regret for not taking
    alternative actions and gradually adjusts its strategy to
    minimize this regret. This processconverges to a Nash equilibrium
    strategy which is unexploitable even by a perfect opponent who
    knows your strategy.*
    I didn't know that; very interesting. And I'll bet it had an
    excellent poker face.



     Have you read the book that describes Einstein's patented ideas. 
    He patented quite a few inventions and in some cases, with the
    help of an engineering partner, tried to make them into products. 
    For example he patented an airfoil.  The only one that worked was
    a gas refrigerator.  Even geniuses don't always have good ideas.



8EBF4576-5257-4FC6-B629-890F7FAC89BC.jpeg





    Brent


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f402981b-aa79-4085-95a8-37fd6b47fca6%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to